Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chandler Carruth
5a88dda4be Sort the #include lines for unittest/...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-12-04 10:23:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4334dd96a9 Switch LLVM_USE_RVALUE_REFERENCES to LLVM_HAS_RVALUE_REFERENCES.
Rationale:
1) This was the name in the comment block. ;]
2) It matches Clang's __has_feature naming convention.
3) It matches other compiler-feature-test conventions.

Sorry for the noise. =]

I've also switch the comment block to use a \brief tag and not duplicate
the name.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168996 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-11-30 11:45:22 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
147d9e0511 Add range erase, element insert, and range insert methods to
TinyPtrVector. With these, it is sufficiently functional for my more
normal / pedestrian uses.

I've not included some r-value reference stuff here because the value
type for a TinyPtrVector is, necessarily, just a pointer.

I've added tests that cover the basic behavior of these routines, but
they aren't as comprehensive as I'd like. In particular, they don't
really test the iterator semantics as thoroughly as they should. Maybe
some brave soul will feel enterprising and flesh them out. ;]

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@161104 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-08-01 08:40:48 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
06bd8ca8c2 Implement copy and move assignment for TinyPtrVector. These try to
re-use allocated vectors as much as possible.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@161041 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-07-31 09:42:24 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
40dab1059e Bring TinyPtrVector under test. Somehow we never picked up unit tests
for this class. These tests exercise most of the basic properties, but
the API for TinyPtrVector is very strange currently. My plan is to start
fleshing out the API to match that of SmallVector, but I wanted a test
for what is there first.

Sadly, it doesn't look reasonable to just re-use the SmallVector tests,
as this container can only ever store pointers, and much of the
SmallVector testing is to get construction and destruction right.

Just to get this basic test working, I had to add value_type to the
interface.

While here I found a subtle bug in the combination of 'erase', 'begin',
and 'end'. Both 'begin' and 'end' wanted to use a null pointer to
indicate the "end" iterator of an empty vector, regardless of whether
there is actually a vector allocated or the pointer union is null.
Everything else was fine with this except for erase. If you erase the
last element of a vector after it has held more than one element, we
return the end iterator of the underlying SmallVector which need not be
a null pointer. Instead, simply use the pointer, and poniter + size()
begin/end definitions in the tiny case, and delegate to the inner vector
whenever it is present.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@161024 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2012-07-31 02:48:31 +00:00