Additionally, all such cases are handled with no dynamic check.
All `classof()` of the form
class Foo {
[...]
static bool classof(const Bar *) { return true; }
[...]
}
where Foo is an ancestor of Bar are no longer necessary.
Don't write them!
Note: The exact test is `is_base_of<Foo, Bar>`, which is non-strict, so
that Foo is considered an ancestor of itself.
This leads to the following rule of thumb for LLVM-style RTTI:
The argument type of `classof()` should be a strict ancestor.
For more information about implementing LLVM-style RTTI, see
docs/HowToSetUpLLVMStyleRTTI.rst
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
this is still minimal on purpose, but I plan to migrate the ugly
hack under #ifdef DEBUG_CAST_OPERATORS into this file
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108849 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
