This occurs due to an alloca representing a separate ownership from the
original pointer. Thus consider the following pseudo-IR:
objc_retain(%a)
for (...) {
objc_retain(%a)
%block <- %a
F(%block)
objc_release(%block)
}
objc_release(%a)
From the perspective of the optimizer, the %block is a separate
provenance from the original %a. Thus the optimizer pairs up the inner
retain for %a and the outer release from %a, resulting in segfaults.
This is fixed by noting that the signature of a mismatch of
retain/releases inside the for loop is a Use/CanRelease top down with an
None bottom up (since bottom up the Retain-CanRelease-Use-Release
sequence is completed by the inner objc_retain, but top down due to the
differing provenance from the objc_release said sequence is not
completed). In said case in CheckForCFGHazards, we now clear the state
of %a implying that no pairing will occur.
Additionally a test case is included.
rdar://12969722
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Listing all of the attributes for the callee of a call/invoke instruction is way
too much and makes the IR unreadable. Use references to attributes instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175877 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the retains and releases all use the same SSA pointer value.
Also, don't let CFG hazards disrupt nested retain+release pair
optimizations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@137399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
