No tests; these changes aren't really interesting in the sense that the logic is the same for volatile and atomic.
I believe this completes all of the changes necessary for the optimizer to handle loads and stores correctly. I'm going to try and come up with some additional testing, though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
better.
Don't immediately give up when an add operation can't be trivially
sign/zero-extended within a loop. If it has NSW/NUW flags, generate a
new expression with sign extended (non-recurrent) operand. As before,
if SCEV says that all sign extends are loop invariant, then we can
widen the operation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139453 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
init.trampoline and adjust.trampoline intrinsics, into two intrinsics
like in GCC. While having one combined intrinsic is tempting, it is
not natural because typically the trampoline initialization needs to
be done in one function, and the result of adjust trampoline is needed
in a different (nested) function. To get around this llvm-gcc hacks the
nested function lowering code to insert an additional parent variable
holding the adjust.trampoline result that can be accessed from the child
function. Dragonegg doesn't have the luxury of tweaking GCC code, so it
stored the result of adjust.trampoline in the memory GCC set aside for
the trampoline itself (this is always available in the child function),
and set up some new memory (using an alloca) to hold the trampoline.
Unfortunately this breaks Go which allocates trampoline memory on the
heap and wants to use it even after the parent has exited (!). Rather
than doing even more hacks to get Go working, it seemed best to just use
two intrinsics like in GCC. Patch mostly by Sanjoy Das.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This changes loop unrolling to use the same mechanism for trip count
computation as indvars. This is a stronger check that tends to unroll
more loops. A very common side-effect is that many single iteration
loops will be removed sooner. The real goal was simply to remove
dependence on canonical IVs.
x86 is break even.
ARM performance changes to expect (+ is good):
External/SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/183.equake +13%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry +21%
MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff +3%
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle -14%
The Puzzle regression is actually an improvement in loop optimization
that defeats GVN: rdar://problem/10065079.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@139009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The landingpad instruction is required in the landing pad block. Because we're
not deleting terminating instructions, the invoke may still jump to here (see
Transforms/SCCP/2004-11-16-DeadInvoke.ll). Remove all uses of the landingpad
instruction, but keep it around until code-gen can remove the basic block.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ssa, so it has to be run really early in the pipeline. Any replacement
should probably use the SSAUpdater.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138841 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Optimize chained bitcasts of the form A->B->A.
Undo r138722 and change isEliminableCastPair to allow this case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In theory this could be extended to other instructions, eg. division by zero, but it's likely that it will "miscompile" some code because people depend on div by zero not trapping. NULL pointer dereference usually leads to a crash so we should be on the safe side.
This shrinks the size of a Release clang by 16k on x86_64.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
known-incremented level, because the two concepts can be used
to prove the saftey of a retain+release removal in different
ways.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We have to be careful when splitting the landing pad block, because the
landingpad instruction is required to remain as the first non-PHI of an invoke's
unwind edge. To retain this, we split the block into two blocks, moving the
predecessors within the loop to one block and the remaining predecessors to the
other. The landingpad instruction is cloned into the new blocks.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138015 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SplitLandingPadPredecessors is similar to SplitBlockPredecessors in that it
splits the current block and attaches a set of predecessors to the new basic
block. However, it differs from SplitBlockPredecessors in that it's specifically
designed to handle landing pad blocks.
Two new basic blocks are created: one that is has the vector of predecessors as
its predecessors and one that has the remaining predecessors as its
predecessors. Those two new blocks then receive a cloned copy of the landingpad
instruction from the original block. The landingpad instructions are joined in a
PHI, etc. Like SplitBlockPredecessors, it updates the LLVM IR, AliasAnalysis,
DominatorTree, DominanceFrontier, LoopInfo, and LCCSA analyses.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@138014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
