This reverts commit 342d92c7a0.
Turns out we're going with a different schema design to represent
DW_TAG_imported_modules so we won't need this extra field.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178099 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of a class. Emit static data member declarations and definitions
through correctly.
Part of PR14471.
Patch by Paul Robinson!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172590 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This works fine with GDB for member variable pointers, but GDB's support for
member function pointers seems to be quite unrelated to
DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type. (see GDB bug 14998 for details)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171698 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
AKA: Recompile *ALL* the source code!
This one went much better. No manual edits here. I spot-checked for
silliness and grep-checked for really broken edits and everything seemed
good. It all still compiles. Yell if you see something that looks goofy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169133 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
temporarily as it is breaking the gdb bots.
This reverts commit r167806/e7ff4c14b157746b3e0228d2dce9f70712d1c126.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167886 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If we have a type 'int a[1]' and a type 'int b[0]', the generated DWARF is the
same for both of them because we use the 'upper_bound' attribute. Instead use
the 'count' attrbute, which gives the correct number of elements in the array.
<rdar://problem/12566646>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add some support for dealing with an object pointer on arguments.
Part of rdar://9797999
which now supports adding the object pointer attribute to the
subprogram as it should.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163754 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
