I think it's almost impossible to fold atomic fences profitably under
LLVM/C++11 semantics. As a result, this is now unused and just
cluttering up the target interface.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179940 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
trying to move as much FastISel logic as possible out of the main path in
SelectionDAGISel - intermixing them just adds confusion.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179902 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adding another CU-wide list, in this case of imported_modules (since they
should be relatively rare, it seemed better to add a list where each element
had a "context" value, rather than add a (usually empty) list to every scope).
This takes care of DW_TAG_imported_module, but to fully address PR14606 we'll
need to expand this to cover DW_TAG_imported_declaration too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179836 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a rework of the broken parts in r179373 which were subsequently reverted in r179374 due to incompatibility with C++98 compilers. This version should be ok under C++98.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179520 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The register allocator expects minimal physreg live ranges. Schedule
physreg copies accordingly. This is slightly tricky when they occur in
the middle of the scheduling region. For now, this is handled by
rescheduling the copy when its associated instruction is
scheduled. Eventually we may instead bundle them, but only if we can
preserve the bundles as parallel copies during regalloc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179449 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When debugging performance regressions we often ask ourselves if the regression
that we see is due to poor isel/sched/ra or due to some micro-architetural
problem. When comparing two code sequences one good way to rule out front-end
bottlenecks (and other the issues) is to force code alignment. This pass adds
a flag that forces the alignment of all of the basic blocks in the program.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179353 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the simple and triangle if-conversion cases, when CopyAndPredicateBlock is
used because the to-be-predicated block has other predecessors, we need to
explicitly remove the old copied block from the successors list. Normally if
conversion relies on TII->AnalyzeBranch combined with BB->CorrectExtraCFGEdges
to cleanup the successors list, but if the predicated block contained an
un-analyzable branch (such as a now-predicated return), then this will fail.
These extra successors were causing a problem on PPC because it was causing
later passes (such as PPCEarlyReturm) to leave dead return-only basic blocks in
the code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179227 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The target hooks are getting out of hand. What does it mean to run
before or after regalloc anyway? Allowing either Pass* or AnalysisID
pass identification should make it much easier for targets to use the
substitutePass and insertPass APIs, and create less need for badly
named target hooks.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
therefore not at all) of the pc or statement list. We also don't
need to emit the compilation dir so save so space and time
and don't bother.
Fix up the testcase accordingly and verify that we don't emit
the attributes or the items that they use.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This pattern occurs in SROA output due to the way vector arguments are lowered
on ARM.
The testcase from PR15525 now compiles into this, which is better than the code
we got with the old scalarrepl:
_Store:
ldr.w r9, [sp]
vmov d17, r3, r9
vmov d16, r1, r2
vst1.8 {d16, d17}, [r0]
bx lr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D647
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179106 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a relocation across sections. Do this for DW_AT_stmt list in the
skeleton CU and check the relocations in the debug_info section.
Add a FIXME for multiple CUs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178969 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We used to do "SmallString += CUID", which is incorrect, since CUID will
be truncated to a char.
rdar://problem/13573833
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178941 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes PEI as previously described, but correctly handles the case where
the instruction defining the virtual register to be scavenged is the first in
the block. Arnold provided me with a bugpoint-reduced test case, but even that
seems too large to use as a regression test. If I'm successful in cleaning it
up then I'll commit that as well.
Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178919 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
During LTO, the target options on functions within the same Module may
change. This would necessitate resetting some of the back-end. Do this for X86,
because it's a Friday afternoon.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverting because this breaks one of the LTO builders. Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For now, just save the compile time since the ConvergingScheduler
heuristics don't use this analysis. We'll probably enable it later
after compile-time investigation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178822 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On certain architectures we can support efficient vectorized version of
instructions if the operand value is uniform (splat) or a constant scalar.
An example of this is a vector shift on x86.
We can efficiently support
for (i = 0 ; i < ; i += 4)
w[0:3] = v[0:3] << <2, 2, 2, 2>
but not
for (i = 0; i < ; i += 4)
w[0:3] = v[0:3] << x[0:3]
This patch adds a parameter to getArithmeticInstrCost to further qualify operand
values as uniform or uniform constant.
Targets can then choose to return a different cost for instructions with such
operand values.
A follow-up commit will test this feature on x86.
radar://13576547
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is a difference for FORM_ref_addr between DWARF 2 and DWARF 3+.
Since Eric is against guarding DWARF 2 ref_addr with DarwinGDBCompat, we are
still in discussion on how to handle this.
The correct solution is to update our header to say version 4 instead of version
2 and update tool chains as well.
rdar://problem/13559431
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the target system.
It was hard-coded to 4 bytes before. I can't get llvm to generate a
ref_addr on a reasonably sized testing case.
rdar://problem/13559431
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178722 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For this we need to use a libcall. Previously LLVM didn't implement
libcall support for frem, so I've added it in the usual
straightforward manner. A test case from the bug report is included.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178639 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The new instruction scheduling models provide information about the
number of cycles consumed on each processor resource. This makes it
possible to estimate ILP more accurately than simply counting
instructions / issue width.
The functions getResourceDepth() and getResourceLength() now identify
the limiting processor resource, and return a cycle count based on that.
This gives more precise resource information, particularly in traces
that use one resource a lot more than others.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178553 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
