This violates the ABI (that area is "reserved"), and
while it is safe if all code is generated with current
compilers, there is some very old code around that uses
that slot for something else, and breaks if it is stored
into. Adjust testcases looking for current behavior.
I've verified that the stack frame size is right in all
testcases, whether it changed or not. 7311323.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@89811 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
generates a sequence similar to this:
__Z4funci:
LFB2:
mflr r0
LCFI0:
stmw r30,-8(r1)
LCFI1:
stw r0,8(r1)
LCFI2:
stwu r1,-80(r1)
LCFI3:
mr r30,r1
LCFI4:
where LCFI3 and LCFI4 are used by the FDE to indicate what the FP, LR, and other
things are. We generated something more like this:
Leh_func_begin1:
mflr r0
stw r31, 20(r1)
stw r0, 8(r1)
Llabel1:
stwu r1, -80(r1)
Llabel2:
mr r31, r1
Note that we are missing the "mr" instruction. This patch makes it more like the
GCC output.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@86729 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
