A further step to correctly emitting concrete out of line definitions
preceeding inlined instances of the same program.
To do this, emission of subprograms must be delayed until required since
we don't know which (abstract only (if there's no out of line
definition), concrete only (if there are no inlined instances), or both)
DIEs are required at the start of the module.
To reduce the test churn in the following commit that actually fixes the
bug, this commit introduces the lazy DIE construction and cleans up test
cases that are impacted by the changes in the resulting DIE ordering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209675 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Breaks GDB buildbot
(http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75/builds/14517)
GCC emits DW_AT_object_pointer /everywhere/ (declaration, abstract
definition, inlined subroutine), but it looks like GCC relies on it
being somewhere other than the declaration, at least. I'll experiment
further & can hopefully still remove it from the inlined_subroutine.
This reverts commit r207705.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
They just don't need to be there - they're inherited from the abstract
definition. In theory I would like them to be inherited from the
declaration, but the DWARF standard doesn't quite say that... we can
probably do it anyway but I'm less confident about that so I'll leave it
for a separate commit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207717 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This effectively reverts r164326, but adds some comments and
justification and ensures we /don't/ emit the DW_AT_object_pointer on
the (abstract and concrete) definitions. (while still preserving it on
standalone definitions involving ObjC Blocks)
This does increase the size of member function declarations from 7 to 11
bytes, unfortunately, but still seems like the Right Thing to do so that
callers that see only the declaration still have the information about
the object pointer. That said, I don't know what, if any, DWARF
consumers don't have a heuristic to guess this in the case of normal
C++ member functions - perhaps we can remove it entirely.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207705 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While refactoring out constructScopeDIE into two functions I realized we
were emitting DW_AT_object_pointer in the inlined subroutine when we
didn't need to (GCC doesn't, and the abstract subprogram definition has
the information already).
So here's the refactoring and the bug fix. This is one step of
refactoring to remove some subtle memory ownership semantics. It turns
out the original constructScopeDIE returned ownership in its return
value in some cases and not in others. The split into two functions now
separates those two semantics - further cleanup (unique_ptr, etc) will
follow.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207441 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
