when safe.
The testcase is basically this nested loop:
void foo(char *X) {
for (int i = 0; i != 100; ++i)
for (int j = 0; j != 100; ++j)
X[j+i*100] = 0;
}
which gets turned into a single memset now. clang -O3 doesn't optimize
this yet though due to a phase ordering issue I haven't analyzed yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instruction *after* the store. The store will always be deleted
if the transformation kicks in, so we'd do an N^2 scan of every
loop block. Whoops.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122805 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FunctionPass. It probably doesn't have a reason to be a LoopPass, as it will
probably drop the simple fixed point and either use RPO iteration or Duncan's
approach in instsimplify of only revisiting instructions that have changed.
The next step is to preserve LoopSimplify. This looks like it won't be too hard,
although the pass manager doesn't actually seem to respect when non-loop passes
claim to preserve LCSSA or LoopSimplify. This will have to be fixed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122791 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
prologue and epilogue if the adjustment is 8. Similarly, use pushl / popl if
the adjustment is 4 in 32-bit mode.
In the epilogue, takes care to pop to a caller-saved register that's not live
at the exit (either return or tailcall instruction).
rdar://8771137
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122783 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a pointer value has potentially become escaping. Implementations can choose to either fall back to
conservative responses for that value, or may recompute their analysis to accomodate the change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that are allowed to have metadata operands are intrinsic calls,
and the only ones that take metadata currently return void.
Just reject all void instructions, which should not be value
numbered anyway. To future proof things, add an assert to the
getHashValue impl for calls to check that metadata operands
aren't present.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122759 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
nested values, so they can change and drop to null, which can
change the hash and cause havok.
It turns out that it isn't a good idea to value number stuff
with metadata operands anyway, so... don't.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122758 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
capacity on the Visited SmallPtrSet. On 403.gcc, this is about a 4.5% speedup of
CodeGenPrepare time (which itself is 10% of time spent in the backend).
This is progress towards PR8889.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122741 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
update a callGraph when performing the common operation of splicing the body to
a new function and updating all callers (such as via RAUW).
No users yet, though this is intended for DeadArgumentElimination as part of
PR8887.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On 176.gcc, this catches 13090 loads and calls, and increases the
number of simple instructions CSE'd from 29658 to 36208.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of instcombine that is currently in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. This
commit only checks in the pass; it will hopefully be enabled by default later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
sure that the loop we're promoting into a memcpy doesn't mutate the input
of the memcpy. Before we were just checking that the dest of the memcpy
wasn't mod/ref'd by the loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122712 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows us to compile:
void test(char *s, int a) {
__builtin_memset(s, a, 15);
}
into 1 mul + 3 stores instead of 3 muls + 3 stores.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122710 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We could implement a DAGCombine to turn x * 0x0101 back into logic operations
on targets that doesn't support the multiply or it is slow (p4) if someone cares
enough.
Example code:
void test(char *s, int a) {
__builtin_memset(s, a, 4);
}
before:
_test: ## @test
movzbl 8(%esp), %eax
movl %eax, %ecx
shll $8, %ecx
orl %eax, %ecx
movl %ecx, %eax
shll $16, %eax
orl %ecx, %eax
movl 4(%esp), %ecx
movl %eax, 4(%ecx)
movl %eax, (%ecx)
ret
after:
_test: ## @test
movzbl 8(%esp), %eax
imull $16843009, %eax, %eax ## imm = 0x1010101
movl 4(%esp), %ecx
movl %eax, 4(%ecx)
movl %eax, (%ecx)
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122707 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
blocks in a loop, instead of just the header block. This makes it more
aggressive, able to handle Duncan's Ada examples.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122704 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
isExitBlockDominatedByBlockInLoop is a relic of the days when domtree was
*just* a tree and didn't have DFS numbers. Checking DFS numbers is faster
and easier than "limiting the search of the tree".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122702 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8