Implement DebugInfoVerifier, which steals verification relying on
DebugInfoFinder from Verifier.
- Adds LegacyDebugInfoVerifierPassPass, a ModulePass which wraps
DebugInfoVerifier. Uses -verify-di command-line flag.
- Change verifyModule() to invoke DebugInfoVerifier as well as
Verifier.
- Add a call to createDebugInfoVerifierPass() wherever there was a
call to createVerifierPass().
This implementation as a module pass should sidestep efficiency issues,
allowing us to turn debug info verification back on.
<rdar://problem/15500563>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206300 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
various opt verifier commandline options.
Mostly mechanical wiring of the verifier to the new pass manager.
Exercises one of the more unusual aspects of it -- a pass can be either
a module or function pass interchangably. If this is ever problematic,
we can make things more constrained, but for things like the verifier
where there is an "obvious" applicability at both levels, it seems
convenient.
This is the next-to-last piece of basic functionality left to make the
opt commandline driving of the new pass manager minimally functional for
testing and further development. There is still a lot to be done there
(notably the factoring into .def files to kill the current boilerplate
code) but it is relatively uninteresting. The only interesting bit left
for minimal functionality is supporting the registration of analyses.
I'm planning on doing that on top of the .def file switch mostly because
the boilerplate for the analyses would be significantly worse.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199646 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Have I mentioned that functions returning true on error and false on
success are confusing? They're more confusing when their name is
"verify". Anyways...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199622 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes the 'verifyFunction' and 'verifyModule' functions totally
independent operations on the LLVM IR. It also cleans up their API a bit
by lifting the abort behavior into their clients and just using an
optional raw_ostream parameter to control printing.
The implementation of the verifier is now just an InstVisitor with no
multiple inheritance. It also is significantly more const-correct, and
hides the const violations internally. The two layers that force us to
break const correctness are building a DomTree and dispatching through
the InstVisitor.
A new VerifierPass is used to implement the legacy pass manager
interface in terms of the other pieces.
The error messages produced may be slightly different now, and we may
have slightly different short circuiting behavior with different usage
models of the verifier, but generally everything works equivalently and
this unblocks wiring the verifier up to the new pass manager.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199569 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and tweak comments prior to more invasive surgery. Also clean up some
other non-doxygen comments, and run clang-format over the parts that are
going to change dramatically in subsequent commits so that those don't
get cluttered with formatting changes.
No functionality changed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199489 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
trees into the Support library.
These are all expressed in terms of the generic GraphTraits and CFG,
with no reliance on any concrete IR types. Putting them in support
clarifies that and makes the fact that the static analyzer in Clang uses
them much more sane. When moving the Dominators.h file into the IR
library I claimed that this was the right home for it but not something
I planned to work on. Oops.
So why am I doing this? It happens to be one step toward breaking the
requirement that IR verification can only be performed from inside of
a pass context, which completely blocks the implementation of
verification for the new pass manager infrastructure. Fixing it will
also allow removing the concept of the "preverify" step (WTF???) and
allow the verifier to cleanly flag functions which fail verification in
a way that precludes even computing dominance information. Currently,
that results in a fatal error even when you ask the verifier to not
fatally error. It's awesome like that.
The yak shaving will continue...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199095 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
style, and remove some unnecessary comments (the code is perfectly
self-documenting here). Also clang-format the function declarations as
they wrap cleanly now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199084 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it
doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis.
Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide
these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the
abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes
obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can
manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven
interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both
caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API.
But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really
confusing structure until that day arrives.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199082 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
