then don't try to decimate it into its individual pieces. This will just make a mess of the
IR and is pointless if none of the elements are individually accessed. This was generating
really terrible code for std::bitset (PR8980) because it happens to be lowered by clang
as an {[8 x i8]} structure instead of {i64}.
The testcase now is optimized to:
define i64 @test2(i64 %X) {
br label %L2
L2: ; preds = %0
ret i64 %X
}
before we generated:
define i64 @test2(i64 %X) {
%sroa.store.elt = lshr i64 %X, 56
%1 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt to i8
%sroa.store.elt8 = lshr i64 %X, 48
%2 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt8 to i8
%sroa.store.elt9 = lshr i64 %X, 40
%3 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt9 to i8
%sroa.store.elt10 = lshr i64 %X, 32
%4 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt10 to i8
%sroa.store.elt11 = lshr i64 %X, 24
%5 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt11 to i8
%sroa.store.elt12 = lshr i64 %X, 16
%6 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt12 to i8
%sroa.store.elt13 = lshr i64 %X, 8
%7 = trunc i64 %sroa.store.elt13 to i8
%8 = trunc i64 %X to i8
br label %L2
L2: ; preds = %0
%9 = zext i8 %1 to i64
%10 = shl i64 %9, 56
%11 = zext i8 %2 to i64
%12 = shl i64 %11, 48
%13 = or i64 %12, %10
%14 = zext i8 %3 to i64
%15 = shl i64 %14, 40
%16 = or i64 %15, %13
%17 = zext i8 %4 to i64
%18 = shl i64 %17, 32
%19 = or i64 %18, %16
%20 = zext i8 %5 to i64
%21 = shl i64 %20, 24
%22 = or i64 %21, %19
%23 = zext i8 %6 to i64
%24 = shl i64 %23, 16
%25 = or i64 %24, %22
%26 = zext i8 %7 to i64
%27 = shl i64 %26, 8
%28 = or i64 %27, %25
%29 = zext i8 %8 to i64
%30 = or i64 %29, %28
ret i64 %30
}
In this case, instcombine was able to eliminate the nonsense, but in PR8980 enough
PHIs are in play that instcombine backs off. It's better to not generate this stuff
in the first place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123571 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
multiple uses. In some cases, all the uses are the same operation,
so instcombine can go ahead and promote the phi. In the testcase
this pushes an add out of the loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The basic issue is that isel (very reasonably!) expects conditional branches
to be folded, so CGP leaving around a bunch dead computation feeding
conditional branches isn't such a good idea. Just fold branches on constants
into unconditional branches.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123526 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
have objectsize folding recursively simplify away their result when it
folds. It is important to catch this here, because otherwise we won't
eliminate the cross-block values at isel and other times.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123524 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
potentially invalidate it (like inline asm lowering) to be sunk into
their proper place, cleaning up a ton of code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123523 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instead of DomTree/DomFrontier. This may be interesting for reducing compile
time. This is currently disabled, but seems to work just fine.
When this is enabled, we eliminate two runs of dominator frontier, one in the
"early per-function" optimizations and one in the "interlaced with inliner"
function passes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123434 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While there, I noticed that the transform "undef >>a X -> undef" was wrong.
For example if X is 2 then the top two bits must be equal, so the result can
not be anything. I fixed this in the constant folder as well. Also, I made
the transform for "X << undef" stronger: it now folds to undef always, even
though X might be zero. This is in accordance with the LangRef, but I must
admit that it is fairly aggressive. Also, I added "i32 X << 32 -> undef"
following the LangRef and the constant folder, likewise fairly aggressive.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a minor extension of SROA to handle a special case that is
important for some ARM NEON operations. Some of the NEON intrinsics
return multiple values, which are handled as struct types containing
multiple elements of the same vector type. The corresponding return
types declared in the arm_neon.h header have equivalent arrays. We
need SROA to recognize that it can split up those arrays and structs
into separate vectors, even though they are not always accessed with
the same type. SROA already handles loads and stores of an entire
alloca by using insertvalue/extractvalue to access the individual
pieces, and that code works the same regardless of whether the type
is a struct or an array. So, all that needs to be done is to check
for compatible arrays and homogeneous structs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SROA only split up structs and arrays one level at a time, so padding can
only cause trouble if it is located in between the struct or array elements.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123380 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DT->changeImmediateDominator() trivially ignores identity updates, so there is
really no need for the uniqueing provided by SmallPtrSet.
I expect this to fix PR8954.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123286 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
