CPU, and feature string. Parsing some asm directives can change
subtarget state (e.g. .code 16) and it must be reflected in other
modules (e.g. MCCodeEmitter). That is, the MCSubtargetInfo instance
must be shared.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@134795 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Each target asm parser now creates its own MCSubtatgetInfo (if needed).
- Changed AssemblerPredicate to take subtarget features which tablegen uses
to generate asm matcher subtarget feature queries. e.g.
"ModeThumb,FeatureThumb2" is translated to
"(Bits & ModeThumb) != 0 && (Bits & FeatureThumb2) != 0".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@134678 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Dan noted that this would work on the case shown on the commit message. I think
the case that was failing was a bb ending with a redundant conditional jump:
...
jne foo
foo:
...
I was unable to find any such case in the tests or in a debug build of clang,
so I will revert this part of the patch and watch the bots.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@133004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
we try to branch to them.
Before we were creating successor lists with duplicated entries. Fixing that
found a bug in isBlockOnlyReachableByFallthrough that would causes it to
return the wrong answer for
-----------
...
jne foo
jmp bar
foo:
----------
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and definitions when emitting global variables. This was causing global
declarations to be emitted as if they were definitions.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9429892>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132825 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
handler's data area starts with a 4-byte reference to the personality
function, followed by the DWARF LSDA.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132302 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
handler.
At this moment, only GCC-style exceptions are supported. Other kinds
of exceptions, including "traditional" SEH and Microsoft Visual C++ exceptions,
need more work--and an compiler exception model that isn't specific to
GCC-style exceptions!
In particular, I imagine that it would be possible to mix "traditional" SEH
with GCC-style EH or Microsoft C++ EH. Currently LLVM has no way (beyond some
target-specific defaults and whole-module compiler switches) of knowing which
scheme to use when.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There was no way to check if a given register/mode pair was valid. We now return
an error code (-2) instead of asserting. If anyone thinks that an assert
at this point is really needed, we can autogen a hasValidDwarfRegNum instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132236 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the Win64 EH mechanism to implement GCC-style exceptions. LLVM supports
hardly anything else at this point!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
subregisters:
When a value is in a subregister, at least report the location as being
the superregister. We should extend the .td files to encode the bit
range so that we can produce a DW_OP_bit_piece.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132224 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
