We would create an instruction but not inserting it.
Not inserting the unused instruction would lead us to verification
failure.
This fixes PR21653.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222659 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We tried to get the result of DataLayout::getLargestLegalIntTypeSize but
we didn't have a DataLayout. This resulted in opt crashing.
This fixes PR21651.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222645 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)
Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222632 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixes the self-host fail. Note that this commit activates dominator
analysis in the combiner by default (like the original commit did).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222590 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The alloca's type is irrelevant, only those types which are used in a
load or store of the exact size of the slice should be considered.
This manifested as an assertion failure when we compared the various
types: we had a size mismatch.
This fixes PR21480.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Code seems cleaner and easier to understand this way
This is basically r222416, after fixes for MSVC lack of standard
support, and a few cleaning (got rid of a warning).
Thanks Nakamura Takumi and Nico Weber for the MSVC fixes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222472 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently LoopUnroll generates a prologue loop before the main loop
body to execute first N%UnrollFactor iterations. Also, this loop is
used if trip-count can overflow - it's determined by a runtime check.
However, we've been mistakenly optimizing this loop to a linear code for
UnrollFactor = 2, not taking into account that it also serves as a safe
version of the loop if its trip-count overflows.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r222142. This is causing/exposing an execution-time regression
in spec2006/gcc and coremark on AArch64/A57/Ofast.
Conflicts:
test/Transforms/Reassociate/optional-flags.ll
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222398 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the BasicBlock containing the return instrution has a PHI with 2
incoming values, FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch will remove the no longer
used incoming value and remove the no longer needed phi as well. This
leaves us with a BB that no longer has a PHI, but the subsequent call
to FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch from FoldReturnAndProcessPred will not
remove the return instruction (which still uses the result of the call
instruction). This prevents EliminateRecursiveTailCall to remove
the value, as it is still being used in a basicblock which has no
predecessors.
The basicblock can not be erased on the spot, because its iterator is
still being used in runTRE.
This issue was exposed when removing the threshold on size for lifetime
marker insertion for named temporaries in clang. The testcase is a much
reduced version of peelOffOuterExpr(const Expr*, const ExplodedNode *)
from clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222354 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.
This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222334 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If LowerGEP is enabled, it can lower a GEP with multiple indices into GEPs with a single index
or arithmetic operations. Lowering GEPs can always extract structure indices. Lowering GEPs can
also give use more optimization opportunities. It can benefit passes like CSE, LICM and CGP.
Reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5864
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
move the code from BreakCriticalEdges::runOnFunction()
into a separate utility function llvm::SplitAllCriticalEdges()
so that it can be used independently.
No functionality change intended.
Test Plan: check-llvm
Reviewers: nlewycky
Reviewed By: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6313
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We would attempt to replace an frem's operand with the same operand.
This would cause InstCombine to think real work was done, causing
InstCombine to enter an infinite loop.
This fixes the second part of PR21576.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
EarlyCSE is giving up on the current instruction immediately when it recognizes that the current instruction makes a previous store trivially dead. There's no reason to do this. Once the previous store has been deleted, it's perfectly legal to remember the value of the current store (for value forwarding) and the fact the store occurred (it could be dead too!).
Reviewed by: Hal
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6301
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222241 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is impossible for (x & INT_MAX) == 0 && x == INT_MAX to ever be true.
While this sort of reasoning should normally live in InstSimplify,
the machinery that derives this result is not trivial to split out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I added a pessimization in r217102 to prevent miscompiles when the
incremented induction variable was used in a comparison; it would be
poison.
Try to use the incremented induction variable more often when we can be
sure that the increment won't end in poison.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6222
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When converting a switch to a lookup table we might have to generate a bitmaks
to encode and check for holes in the original switch statement.
The type of this mask depends on the number of switch statements, which can
result in illegal types for pretty much all architectures.
To avoid unnecessary type legalization and help FastISel this commit increases
the size of the bitmask to next power-of-2 value when necessary.
This fixes rdar://problem/18984639.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a simple optimization for switch table lookup:
It computes the output value directly with an (optional) mul and add if there is a linear mapping between index and output.
Example:
int f1(int x) {
switch (x) {
case 0: return 10;
case 1: return 11;
case 2: return 12;
case 3: return 13;
}
return 0;
}
generates:
define i32 @f1(i32 %x) #0 {
entry:
%0 = icmp ult i32 %x, 4
br i1 %0, label %switch.lookup, label %return
switch.lookup:
%switch.offset = add i32 %x, 10
ret i32 %switch.offset
return:
ret i32 0
}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222121 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
