Previously `DwarfExpression::AddExpression()` relied on
default-constructing the end iterators for `DIExpression` -- once the
operands are represented explicitly via `MDExpression` (instead of via
the strange `StringRef` navigator in `DIHeaderIterator`) this won't
work. Explicitly take an iterator for the end of the range.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229572 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
table entry. This happens when SROA splits up an alloca and the resulting
allocas cannot be lowered to SSA values because their address is passed
to a function.
Fixes PR22502.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@228764 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
physical register that is described in a DBG_VALUE.
In the testcase the DBG_VALUE describing "p5" becomes unavailable
because the register its address is in is clobbered and we (currently)
aren't smart enough to realize that the value is rematerialized immediately
after the DBG_VALUE and/or is actually a stack slot.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@227056 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
frontends to use a DIExpression with a DW_OP_deref instead.
This is not only a much more natural place for this informationl; there
is also a technical reason: The FlagIndirectVariable is used to mark a
variable that is turned into a reference by virtue of the calling
convention; this happens for example to aggregate return values.
The inliner, for example, may actually need to undo this indirection to
correctly represent the value in its new context. This is impossible to
implement because the DIVariable can't be safely modified. We can however
safely construct a new DIExpression on the fly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226476 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225974 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
no DWARF register number mapping, or if the register was a virtual
register that was never materialized. Previously, we would just emit a
bogus location, after this patch we don't emit a location at all by
doing an early exit.
After my bugfix in r223401 today, this doesn't actually happen on any
target that I tested this with, but it's still preferable to make the
possibility of a failure explicit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223428 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Usually global variables are in a retain list and instanciated before
any call to constructImportedEntityDIE is made. This isn't true for
forward declarations though.
The testcase for this change is generated by a clang patched to emit
such forward declarations (patch at http://reviews.llvm.org/D6173
which will land soon). The updated testcase tests more than just
global variables, it now tests every type of 'using' clause we
support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222217 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
use DIScopeRef.
A paired commit at clang will follow to show cases where we will use an
identifer for the context of a global variable.
rdar://18958417
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222195 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Clang -gsplit-dwarf self-host -O0, binary increases by 0.0005%, -O2,
binary increases by 25%.
A large binary inside Google, split-dwarf, -O0, and other internal flags
(GDB index, etc) increases by 1.8%, optimized build is 35%.
The size impact may be somewhat greater in .o files (I haven't measured
that much - since the linked executable -O0 numbers seemed low enough)
due to relocations. These relocations could be removed if we taught the
llvm-symbolizer to handle indexed addressing in the .o file (GDB can't
cope with this just yet, but GDB won't be reading this info anyway).
Also debug_ranges could be shared between .o and .dwo, though ideally
debug_ranges would get a schema that could used index(+offset)
addressing, and move to the .dwo file, then we'd be back to sharing
addresses in the address pool again.
But for now, these sizes seem small enough to go ahead with this.
Verified that no other DW_TAGs are produced into the .o file other than
subprograms and inlined_subroutines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This generalizes the range handling for ranges in both the skeleton and
full unit, laying the foundation for the addition of more ranges (rather
than just the CU's special case) in the skeleton CU with fission+gmlt.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221202 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
So that it may be shared between skeleton/full compile unit, for CU
ranges and other ranges to be added for fission+gmlt.
(at some point we might want some kind of object shared between the
skeleton and full compile units for all those things we only want one of
in that scope, rather than having the full unit always look through to
the skeleton... - alternatively, we might be able to have the skeleton
pointer (or another, separate pointer) point to the skeleton or to the
unit itself in non-fission, so we don't have to special case its
absence)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is one of a few steps to generalize range handling to include the
CU range (thus the CU's range list will be moved into the range list
list, losing track of the base address in the process), which means
generalizing ranges from both the skeleton and full unit under fission.
And... then I can used that generalized support for ranges in
fission+gmlt where there'll be a bunch more ranges in the skeleton.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221182 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently we only need to emit skeleton strings into the CU header and
we do this by explicitly calling "addLocalString". With gmlt-in-fission,
we'll be emitting a bunch of other strings from other codepaths where
it's not statically known that these strings will be local or not.
Introduce a virtual function to indicate whether this unit is a DWO unit
or not (I'm not sure if we have a good term for this, the
opposite/alternative to 'skeleton' unit) and use that to generalize the
string emission logic so that strings can be correctly emitted in both
the skeleton and dwo unit when in split dwarf mode.
And to demonstrate that this works, switch the existing special callers
of addLocalString in the skeleton builder to addString - and they still
work. Yay.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221094 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a useful distinction/invariant/delination to make because
LineTablesOnly mode is never relevant to type units, so it's clear that
we're not doing weird line-tables-only-with-types by making this API
choice.
It also lays the foundations nicely for adding gmlt-like data to fission
skeleton CUs while limiting the effects to CUs and not TUs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221093 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This would help catch cases where we might otherwise try to reference a
dwo CU label, which would be weird - because without relocations in the
dwo file it's not generally meaningful to talk about the CU offsets
there (or, if it is, we can do so in absolute terms without using a
relocation to compute it).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221078 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows the CU label to be emitted only for compile units, as
they're the only ones that need it (so they can be referenced from
pubnames)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Type units no longer have skeletons and it's misleading to be able to
query for a type unit's skeleton (it might incorrectly lead one to
conclude that if a unit doesn't have a skeleton it's not in a .dwo
file... ).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221055 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the first big step to allowing gmlt-like inline scope
information in the skeleton CU. While this commit doesn't change the
functionality, it's only a small step to call
"constructAbstractSubprogramDIE" on both the InfoHolder and the
SkeletonHolder (when in use) and that will at least create the abstract
SP dies in that case, though still not creating the other subprograms.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
So that it has access to getOrCreateGlobalVariableDIE. If we ever support
decsribing using directive in C++ classes (thus requiring support in type
units), it will certainly use another mechanism anyway.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5975
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220594 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(part of refactoring to allow subprogram emission in both the skeleton
and main units to enable -gmlt-like data to be included in the skeleton
for live inlined backtracing purposes)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While refactoring this code I was confused by both the name I had
introduced (addNonArgumentVariable... but it has all this logic to
handle argument numbering and keep things in order?) and by the
redundancy. Seems when I fixed the misordered inlined argument handling,
I didn't realize it was mostly redundant with the argument ordering code
(which I may've also written, I'm not sure). So let's just rely on the
more general case.
The only oddity in output this produces is that it means when we emit
all the variables for the current function, we don't track when we've
finished the argument variables and are about to start the local
variables and insert DW_AT_unspecified_parameters (for varargs
functions) there. Instead it ends up after the local variables, scopes,
etc. But this isn't invalid and doesn't cause DWARF consumers problems
that I know of... so we'll just go with that because it makes the code
nice & simple.
(though, let's see what the buildbots have to say about this - *crosses
fingers*)
There will be some cleanup commits to follow to remove the now trivial
wrappers, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220527 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes a bug (introduced by fixing the IR emitted from Clang where
the definition of a static member would be scoped within the class,
rather than within its lexical decl context) where the definition of a
static variable would be placed inside a class.
It also improves source fidelity by scoping static class member
definitions inside the lexical decl context in which tehy are written
(eg: namespace n { class foo { static int i; } int foo::i; } - the
definition of 'i' will be within the namespace 'n' in the DWARF output
now).
Lastly, and the original goal, this reduces debug info size slightly
(and makes debug info easier to read, etc) by placing the definitions of
non-member global variables within their namespace, rather than using a
separate namespace-scoped declaration along with a definition at global
scope.
Based on patches and discussion with Frédéric.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220497 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
