The else case ResultReg was not checked for validity.
To my surprise, this case was not hit in any of the
existing test cases. This includes a new test cases
that tests this path.
Also drop the `target triple` declaration from the
original test as suggested by H.J. Lu, because
apparently with it the test won't be run on Linux
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224901 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the control flow is modelling an if-statement where the only instruction in
the 'then' basic block (excluding the terminator) is a call to cttz/ctlz,
CodeGenPrepare can try to speculate the cttz/ctlz call and simplify the control
flow graph.
Example:
\code
entry:
%cmp = icmp eq i64 %val, 0
br i1 %cmp, label %end.bb, label %then.bb
then.bb:
%c = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %val, i1 true)
br label %end.bb
end.bb:
%cond = phi i64 [ %c, %then.bb ], [ 64, %entry]
\code
In this example, basic block %then.bb is taken if value %val is not zero.
Also, the phi node in %end.bb would propagate the size-of in bits of %val
only if %val is equal to zero.
With this patch, CodeGenPrepare will try to hoist the call to cttz from %then.bb
into basic block %entry only if cttz is cheap to speculate for the target.
Added two new hooks in TargetLowering.h to let targets customize the behavior
(i.e. decide whether it is cheap or not to speculate calls to cttz/ctlz). The
two new methods are 'isCheapToSpeculateCtlz' and 'isCheapToSpeculateCttz'.
By default, both methods return 'false'.
On X86, method 'isCheapToSpeculateCtlz' returns true only if the target has
LZCNT. Method 'isCheapToSpeculateCttz' only returns true if the target has BMI.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6728
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Determining the address of a TLS variable results in a function call in
certain TLS models. This means that a simple ICmpInst might actually
result in invalidating the CTR register.
In such cases, do not attempt to rely on the CTR register for loop
optimization purposes.
This fixes PR22034.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6786
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Consider the following IR:
%3 = load i8* undef
%4 = trunc i8 %3 to i1
%5 = call %jl_value_t.0* @foo(..., i1 %4, ...)
ret %jl_value_t.0* %5
Bools (that are the result of direct truncs) are lowered as whatever
the argument to the trunc was and a "and 1", causing the part of the
MBB responsible for this argument to look something like this:
%vreg8<def,tied1> = AND8ri %vreg7<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR8:%vreg8,%vreg7
Later, when the load is lowered, it will insert
%vreg15<def> = MOV8rm %vreg14, 1, %noreg, 0, %noreg; mem:LD1[undef] GR8:%vreg15 GR64:%vreg14
but remember to (at the end of isel) replace vreg7 by vreg15. Now for
the bug. In fast isel lowering, we mistakenly mark vreg8 as the result
of the load instead of the trunc. This adds a fixup to have
vreg8 replaced by whatever the result of the load is as well, so
we end up with
%vreg15<def,tied1> = AND8ri %vreg15<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR8:%vreg15
which is an SSA violation and causes problems later down the road.
This fixes PR21557.
Test Plan: Test test case from PR21557 is added to the test suite.
Reviewers: ributzka
Reviewed By: ributzka
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6245
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224884 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When materializing constant i1 values, they must be zero extended. We represent
i1 values as [0, 1], not [0, -1], in i32 registers. As it turns out, this code
path was dead for i1 values prior to r216006 (which is why this did not manifest in
miscompiles until recently).
Fixes -O0 self-hosting on PPC64/Linux.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224842 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Bob Wilson pointed out the unnecessary checks that had been committed to the
instruction check predicates. The check was meant to ensure that the check was
not accidentally applied to non-ARM instructions. This is better served as an
assertion rather than a condition check.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224825 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This removes a hardcoded list of instructions in the CodeEmitter. Eventually I intend to remove the predicates on the affected instructions since in any given mode two of them are valid if we supported addr32/addr16 prefixes in the assembler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224809 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On non-Darwin PPC64, the TOC reload needs to come directly after the bctrl
instruction (for indirect calls) because the 'bctrl/ld 2, 40(1)' instruction
sequence is interpreted by the unwinding code in libgcc. To make sure these
occur as a pair, as with other pairings interpreted by the linker, fuse the two
instructions into one instruction (for code generation only).
In the future, we might wish to do this by emitting CFI directives instead,
but this solution is simpler, and mirrors what GCC does. Additional discussion
on this point is contained in the PR.
Fixes PR22015.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It is tempting to mark the fixed stack slot used to store the return address as
immutable when lowering @llvm.returnaddress(i32 0). Unfortunately, within the
function, it is not completely immutable: it is written during the function
prologue. When using post-RA instruction scheduling, the prologue instructions
are available for scheduling, and we're not free to interchange the order of a
particular store in the prologue with loads from that stack location.
Fixes PR21976.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224761 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In r224033, in moving the signed power-of-2 division expansion into
BuildSDIVPow2, I accidentally made it possible to attempt the lowering for a
64-bit division on PPC32. This later asserts.
Fixes PR21928.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224758 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r223862/r224203 tried to also combine base-updating load/stores.
There was a mistake there: the alignment was added as is as an operand to
the ARMISD::VLD/VST node. However, the VLD/VST selection logic doesn't care
about less-than-standard alignment attributes.
For example, no matter the alignment of a v2i64 load (say 1), SelectVLD picks
VLD1q64 (because of the memory type). But VLD1q64 ("vld1.64 {dXX, dYY}") is
8-aligned, per ARMARMv7a 3.2.1.
For the 1-aligned load, what we really want is VLD1q8.
This commit introduces bitcasts if necessary, and changes the vld/vst type to
one whose standard alignment matches the original load/store alignment.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6759
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224754 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When combining consecutive loads+inserts into a single vector load,
we should keep the alignment of the base load. Doing otherwise can, and does,
lead to using overly aligned instructions. In the included test case, for
example, using a 32-byte vmovaps on a 16-byte aligned value. Oops.
rdar://19190968
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
