definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.
This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.
Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206844 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sweep the codebase for common typos. Includes some changes to visible function
names that were misspelt.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200018 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch tries to avoid unrelated changes other than fixing a few
hyphen-related ambiguities and contractions in nearby lines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196471 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Due to the previously added overflow checks, we can have a retain/release
relation that is one directional. This occurs specifically when we run into an
additive overflow causing us to drop state in only one direction. If that
occurs, we should bail and not optimize that retain/release instead of
asserting.
Apologies for the size of the testcase. It is necessary to cause the additive
cfg overflow to trigger.
rdar://15377890
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194083 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The reason that I am turning off this optimization is that there is an
additional case where a block can escape that has come up. Specifically, this
occurs when a block is used in a scope outside of its current scope.
This can cause a captured retainable object pointer whose life is preserved by
the objc_retainBlock to be deallocated before the block is invoked.
An example of the code needed to trigger the bug is:
----
\#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
void (^somethingToDoLater)();
{
NSObject *obj = [NSObject new];
somethingToDoLater = ^{
[obj self]; // Crashes here
};
}
NSLog(@"test.");
somethingToDoLater();
return 0;
}
----
In the next commit, I remove all the dead code that results from this.
Once I put in the fixing commit I will bring back the tests that I deleted in
this commit.
rdar://14802782.
rdar://14868830.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@189869 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I fixed the aforementioned problems that came up on some of the linux boxes.
Major thanks to Nick Lewycky for his help debugging!
rdar://14590914
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188122 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r187941.
The commit was passing on my os x box, but it is failing on some non-osx
platforms. I do not have time to look into it now, so I am reverting and will
recommit after I figure this out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@187946 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is apart of a series of patches to encapsulate PtrState.RRI and
make PtrState.RRI a private field of PtrState.
*NOTE* This is actually the second commit in the patch stream. I should
have put this note on the first such commit r184528.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@184532 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the presense of a block being initialized, the frontend will emit the
objc_retain on the original pointer and the release on the pointer loaded from
the alloca. The optimizer will through the provenance analysis realize that the
two are related (albiet different), but since we only require KnownSafe in one
direction, will match the inner retain on the original pointer with the guard
release on the original pointer. This is fixed by ensuring that in the presense
of allocas we only unconditionally remove pointers if both our retain and our
release are KnownSafe (i.e. we are KnownSafe in both directions) since we must
deal with the possibility that the frontend will emit what (to the optimizer)
appears to be unbalanced retain/releases.
An example of the miscompile is:
%A = alloca
retain(%x)
retain(%x) <--- Inner Retain
store %x, %A
%y = load %A
... DO STUFF ...
release(%y)
call void @use(%x)
release(%x) <--- Guarding Release
getting optimized to:
%A = alloca
retain(%x)
store %x, %A
%y = load %A
... DO STUFF ...
release(%y)
call void @use(%x)
rdar://13750319
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes the statistics gathering completely independent of the actual
optimization occuring, preventing any sort of bleeding over from occuring.
Additionally, it simplifies a switch statement in the non-statistic gathering case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@181719 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Turning retains into retainRV calls disrupts the data flow analysis in
ObjCARCOpts. Thus we move it as late as we can by moving it into
ObjCARCContract.
We leave in the conversion from retainRV -> retain in ObjCARCOpt since
it enables the dataflow analysis.
rdar://10813093
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180698 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r180222.
I think this might tie in with a different problem which will require a
different approach potentially. I am reverting this in the case I need to go
down that second path.
My apologies for the noise. = /.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180590 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Due to the semantics of ARC, we must be extremely conservative with autorelease
calls inserted by the frontend since ARC gaurantees that said object will be in
the autorelease pool after that point, an optimization invariant that the
optimizer must respect.
On the other hand, we are allowed significantly more flexibility with
autoreleaseRV instructions.
Often times though this flexibility is disrupted by early transformations which
transform objc_autoreleaseRV => objc_autorelease if said instruction is no
longer being used as part of an RV pair (generally due to inlining). Since we
can not tell the difference in between an autorelease put into place by the
frontend and one created through said ``strength reduction'' we can not perform
these optimizations.
The addition of this set gets around said issues by allowing us to differentiate
in between said two cases.
rdar://problem/13697741.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@180222 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
