This could be 'null' or the empty string, DIDescriptor::getStringField
coalesces the two cases anyway so it's just a matter of legible/efficient
representation.
The change in behavior of the DICompileUnit::get* functions could be
subsumed by the full verification check - but ideally that should just be an
assertion if we could front-load the actual debug info metadata failure paths.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176907 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Versioned debug info support has been a burden to maintain & also compromised
current debug info verification by causing test cases testing old debug info to
remain rather than being updated to the latest. It also makes it hard to add or
change the metadata schema by requiring various backwards-compatibility in the
DI* hierarchy.
So it's being removed in preparation for new changes to the schema to tidy up
old/unnecessary fields and add new fields needed for new debug info (well, new
to LLVM at least).
The more surprising part of this is the changes to DI*::Verify - this became
necessary due to the changes to AsmWriter. AsmWriter was relying on the version
test to decide which bits of metadata were actually debug info when printing
the comment annotations. Without the version information the tag numbers were
too common & it would print debug info on random metadata that happened to
start with an integer that matched a tag number. Instead this change makes the
Verify functions more precise (just adding "number of operands" checks - not
type checking those operands yet) & relies on that to decide which metadata is
debug info metadata.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176838 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main lists of debug info metadata attached to the compile_unit had an extra
layer of metadata nodes they went through for no apparent reason. This patch
removes that (& still passes just as much of the GDB 7.5 test suite). If anyone
can show evidence as to why these extra metadata nodes are there I'm open to
reverting this patch & documenting why they're there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@174266 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We weren't encoding boolean constants correctly due to modeling boolean as a
signed type & then sign extending an i1 up to a byte & getting 255.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of a class. Emit static data member declarations and definitions
through correctly.
Part of PR14471.
Patch by Paul Robinson!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172590 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This works fine with GDB for member variable pointers, but GDB's support for
member function pointers seems to be quite unrelated to
DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type. (see GDB bug 14998 for details)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171698 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
