The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
temporarily as it is breaking the gdb bots.
This reverts commit r167806/e7ff4c14b157746b3e0228d2dce9f70712d1c126.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167886 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If we have a type 'int a[1]' and a type 'int b[0]', the generated DWARF is the
same for both of them because we use the 'upper_bound' attribute. Instead use
the 'count' attrbute, which gives the correct number of elements in the array.
<rdar://problem/12566646>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@167806 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
