Now that only the register-scavenger version of the CR spilling code remains,
we no longer need the Darwin R2 hack. Darwin can use R0 as a spare register in
any case where the System V ABI uses it (R0 is special architecturally, and so
is reserved under all common ABIs).
A few test cases needed to be updated to reflect the register-allocation changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176868 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. The ST*UX instructions that store and update the stack pointer did not set define/kill on R1. This became a problem when I activated post-RA scheduling (and had incorrectly adjusted the Frames-large test).
2. eliminateFrameIndex did not kill its scavenged temporary register, and this could cause the scavenger to exhaust all available registers (and its emergency spill slot) when there were a lot of CR values to spill. The 2010-02-12-saveCR test has been adjusted to check for this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@147359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
stack frame, the prolog/epilog code was using the same
register for the copy of CR and the address of the save slot. Oops.
This is fixed here for Darwin, sort of, by reserving R2 for this case.
A better way would be to do the store before the decrement of SP,
which is safe on Darwin due to the red zone.
SVR4 probably has the same problem, but I don't know how to fix it;
there is no red zone and R2 is already used for something else.
I'm going to leave it to someone interested in that target.
Better still would be to rewrite the CR-saving code completely;
spilling each CR subregister individually is horrible code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@96015 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
