the one case that ADCE catches that normal DCE doesn't: non-induction variable
loop computations.
This implementation handles this problem without using postdominators.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51668 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
sometimes a "mov %ebp, %esp" in the epilogue.
Force these tests that rely on counting 'mov' to use i686-apple-darwin8.8.0
where they were written.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Analysis/ConstantFolding to fold ConstantExpr's, then make instcombine use it
to try to use targetdata to fold constant expressions on void instructions.
Also extend the icmp(inttoptr, inttoptr) folding to handle the case where
int size != ptr size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The SimplifyCFG pass looks at basic blocks that contain only phi nodes,
followed by an unconditional branch. In a lot of cases, such a block (BB) can
be merged into their successor (Succ).
This merging is performed by TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock. It does
this by taking all phi nodes in the succesor block Succ and expanding them to
include the predecessors of BB. Furthermore, any phi nodes in BB are moved to
Succ and expanded to include the predecessors of Succ as well.
Before attempting this merge, CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs checks to see if
all phi nodes can be properly merged. All functional changes are made to
this function, only comments were updated in
TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock.
In the original code, CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs looks quite convoluted
and more like stack of checks added to handle different kinds of situations
than a comprehensive check. In particular the first check in the function did
some value checking for the case that BB and Succ have a common predecessor,
while the last check in the function simply rejected all cases where BB and
Succ have a common predecessor. The first check was still useful in the case
that BB did not contain any phi nodes at all, though, so it was not completely
useless.
Now, CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs is restructured to to look a lot more
similar to the code that actually performs the merge. Both functions now look
at the same phi nodes in about the same order. Any conflicts (phi nodes with
different values for the same source) that could arise from merging or moving
phi nodes are detected. If no conflicts are found, the merge can happen.
Apart from only restructuring the checks, two main changes in functionality
happened.
Firstly, the old code rejected blocks with common predecessors in most cases.
The new code performs some extra checks so common predecessors can be handled
in a lot of cases. Wherever common predecessors still pose problems, the
blocks are left untouched.
Secondly, the old code rejected the merge when values (phi nodes) from BB were
used in any other place than Succ. However, it does not seem that there is any
situation that would require this check. Even more, this can be proven.
Consider that BB is a block containing of a single phi node "%a" and a branch
to Succ. Now, since the definition of %a will dominate all of its uses, BB
will dominate all blocks that use %a. Furthermore, since the branch from BB to
Succ is unconditional, Succ will also dominate all uses of %a.
Now, assume that one predecessor of Succ is not dominated by BB (and thus not
dominated by Succ). Since at least one use of %a (but in reality all of them)
is reachable from Succ, you could end up at a use of %a without passing
through it's definition in BB (by coming from X through Succ). This is a
contradiction, meaning that our original assumption is wrong. Thus, all
predecessors of Succ must also be dominated by BB (and thus also by Succ).
This means that moving the phi node %a from BB to Succ does not pose any
problems when the two blocks are merged, and any use checks are not needed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51478 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and/or to handle more cases (such as this add-sitofp.ll testcase), and
port it to selectiondag's ComputeNumSignBits.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51469 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and bitcode support for the extractvalue and insertvalue
instructions and constant expressions.
Note that this does not yet include CodeGen support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
get inline asm working as well as it did previously with the CBE
with the new MRV support for inline asm.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51420 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
BB1:
vr1025 = copy vr1024
..
BB2:
vr1024 = op
= op vr1025
<loop eventually branch back to BB1>
Even though vr1025 is copied from vr1024, it's not safe to coalesced them since live range of vr1025 intersects the def of vr1024. This happens when vr1025 is assigned the value of the previous iteration of vr1024 in the loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51394 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If local spiller optimization turns some instruction into an identity copy, it will be removed. If the output register happens to be dead (and source is obviously killed), transfer the kill / dead information to last use / def in the same MBB.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to accurately represent the integer. This triggers 9 times in 471.omnetpp,
though 8 of those seem to be inlined from the same place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51271 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
type and the other operand is a constant into integer comparisons.
This happens surprisingly frequently (e.g. 10 times in 471.omnetpp),
which are things like this:
%tmp8283 = sitofp i32 %tmp82 to double
%tmp1013 = fcmp ult double %tmp8283, 0.0
Clearly comparing tmp82 against i32 0 is cheaper here.
this also triggers 8 times in gobmk, including this one:
%tmp375376 = sitofp i32 %tmp375 to double
%tmp377 = fcmp ogt double %tmp375376, 8.150000e+01
which is comparing an integer against 81.5 :).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51268 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
intersecting bits. This triggers all over the place, for example in lencode,
with adds of stuff like:
%tmp580 = mul i32 %tmp579, 2
%tmp582 = and i32 %b8, 1
and
%tmp28 = shl i32 %abs.i, 1
%sign.0 = select i1 %tmp23, i32 1, i32 0
and
%tmp344 = shl i32 %tmp343, 2
%tmp346 = and i32 %tmp96, 3
etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51263 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
whether or not -funit-at-a-time is used (C++ uses
it, C doesn't) - it was working before only when
not doing unit-at-a-time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51258 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a potentially infinite loop, which is undesirable. Instead, test the LICM behavior
that we're really interested in.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51177 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test/Verifier/2002-11-05-GetelementptrPointers.ll, which was incorrect.
Instead, fix getIndexedType to not follow pointer types, as
PointerType is a subclass of CompositeType.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
use-before-def. The problem comes up in code with multiple PHIs where
one PHI is being rewritten in terms of the other, but the other needs
to be casted first. LLVM rules requre the cast instruction to be
inserted after any PHI instructions, but when instructions were
inserted to replace the second PHI value with a function of the first,
they were ended up going before the cast instruction. Avoid this
problem by remembering the location of the cast instruction, when one
is needed, and inserting the expansion of the new value after it.
This fixes a bug that surfaced in 255.vortex on x86-64 when
instcombine was removed from the middle of the loop optimization
passes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51169 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
is bitcast to return a floating point value. The result of the instruction may
not be used by the program afterwards, and LLVM will happily remove all
instructions except the call. But, on some platforms, if a value is returned as
a floating point, it may need to be removed from the stack (like x87). Thus, we
can't get rid of the bitcast even if there isn't a use of the value.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Makes it possible to use options with names like "Wa,".
Also fixes the -Wall option handling as a side-effect.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Note, some of the code will be moved into target independent part of DAG combiner in a subsequent patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
also need to be checked for memory modifying instructions before we
can sink them. THis fixes the second half of PR2297.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50860 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
%ecx = op
store %cl<kill>, (addr)
(addr) = op %al
It's not safe to unfold the last operand and eliminate store even though %cl is marked kill. It's a sub-register use which means one of its super-register(s) may be used below.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50794 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DemoteRegToStack doesn't work with MRVs yet, because it relies on the
ability to load/store things.
This fixes PR2285.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50667 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the code being generated does not require an executable stack.
Also, add target-specific code to make use of this on Linux
on x86.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50634 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ffastmath mode. This fixes rdar://5902801, a miscompilation
of gcc.dg/builtins-8.c.
Bill, please pull this into Tak.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50523 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move platform independent code (lowering of possibly overwritten
arguments, check for tail call optimization eligibility) from
target X86ISelectionLowering.cpp to TargetLowering.h and
SelectionDAGISel.cpp.
Initial PowerPC tail call implementation:
Support ppc32 implemented and tested (passes my tests and
test-suite llvm-test).
Support ppc64 implemented and half tested (passes my tests).
On ppc tail call optimization is performed if
caller and callee are fastcc
call is a tail call (in tail call position, call followed by ret)
no variable argument lists or byval arguments
option -tailcallopt is enabled
Supported:
* non pic tail calls on linux/darwin
* module-local tail calls on linux(PIC/GOT)/darwin(PIC)
* inter-module tail calls on darwin(PIC)
If constraints are not met a normal call will be emitted.
A test checking the argument lowering behaviour on x86-64 was added.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50477 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
we were checking for it in the wrong order. This caused a miscompilation because the
return slot optimization assumes that the call it is dealing with is NOT a memcpy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50444 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We now compile test2/test3 to:
_test2:
## InlineAsm Start
set %xmm0, %xmm1
## InlineAsm End
addps %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
_test3:
## InlineAsm Start
set %xmm0, %xmm1
## InlineAsm End
paddd %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
as expected.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50389 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
towards PR2094. It now compiles the attached .ll file to:
_sad16_sse2:
movslq %ecx, %rax
## InlineAsm Start
%ecx %rdx %rax %rax %r8d %rdx %rsi
## InlineAsm End
## InlineAsm Start
set %eax
## InlineAsm End
ret
which is pretty decent for a 3 output, 4 input asm.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50386 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
e.g.
vr1024<2> extract_subreg vr1025, 2
If vr1024 do not have the same register class as vr1025, it's not safe to coalesce this away. For example, vr1024 might be a GPR32 while vr1025 might be a GPR64.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50385 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add a new test, and_ops_more.ll, which is XFAIL'd, to
record the parts of and_ops.ll that were affected by this
change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50379 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
