instructions out of InstCombine and into InstructionSimplify. While
there, introduce an m_AllOnes pattern to simplify matching with integers
and vectors with all bits equal to one.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@119536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative) "(A op C1) op C2" -> "A op (C1 op C2)",
which previously was only done if C1 and C2 were constants, to occur whenever
"C1 op C2" simplifies (a la InstructionSimplify). Since the simplifying operand
combination can no longer be assumed to be the right-hand terms, consider all of
the possible permutations. When compiling "gcc as one big file", transform 2
(i.e. using right-hand operands) fires about 4000 times but it has to be said
that most of the time the simplifying operands are both constants. Transforms
3, 4 and 5 each fired once. Transform 6, which is an existing transform that
I didn't change, never fired. With this change, the testcase is now optimized
perfectly with one run of instcombine (previously it required instcombine +
reassociate + instcombine, and it may just have been luck that this worked).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@119002 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to expose greater opportunities for store narrowing in codegen. This patch fixes a potential
infinite loop in instcombine caused by one of the introduced transforms being overly aggressive.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This can result in increased opportunities for store narrowing in code generation. Update a number of
tests for this change. This fixes <rdar://problem/8285027>.
Additionally, because this inverts the order of ors and ands, some patterns for optimizing or-of-and-of-or
no longer fire in instances where they did originally. Add a simple transform which recaptures most of these
opportunities: if we have an or-of-constant-or and have failed to fold away the inner or, commute the order
of the two ors, to give the non-constant or a chance for simplification instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113679 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the corresponding or-icmp-and pattern. This has the added benefit of doing
the matching earlier, and thus being less susceptible to being confused by
earlier transforms.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
parts of the cmp|cmp and cmp&cmp folding logic wasn't prepared for vectors
(unrelated to the bug but noticed while in the code) and the code was
*definitely* not safe to use by the (cast icmp)|(cast icmp) handling logic
that I added in r95855. Fix all this up by changing the various routines
to more consistently use IRBuilder and not pass in the I which had the wrong
type.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@97801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
long test(long x) { return (x & 123124) | 3; }
Currently compiles to:
_test:
orl $3, %edi
movq %rdi, %rax
andq $123127, %rax
ret
This is because instruction and DAG combiners canonicalize
(or (and x, C), D) -> (and (or, D), (C | D))
However, this is only profitable if (C & D) != 0. It gets in the way of the
3-addressification because the input bits are known to be zero.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@97616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and T->isPointerTy(). Convert most instances of the first form to the second form.
Requested by Chris.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@96344 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
what it does. Enhance it to return false to optimizing vector
sign extensions from vector comparisions, which is the idiom used
to get a splatted vector for a vector comparison.
Doing this breaks vector-casts.ll, add some compensating
transformations to handle the important case they cover without
depending on this canonicalization.
This fixes rdar://7434900 a serious pessimization of vector compares.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@95855 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
xform it is checking to actually pass. There is no need to match
m_SelectCst<0, -1> since instcombine canonicalizes that into not(sext).
Add matches for sext(not(x)) in addition to not(sext(x)).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@95420 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
"sext cond" instead of a select. This simplifies some instcombine
code, matches the policy for zext (cond ? 1 : 0 -> zext), and allows
us to generate better code for a testcase on ppc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@94339 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8