Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Evan Cheng
e837dead3c - Rename TargetInstrDesc, TargetOperandInfo to MCInstrDesc and MCOperandInfo and
sink them into MC layer.
- Added MCInstrInfo, which captures the tablegen generated static data. Chang
TargetInstrInfo so it's based off MCInstrInfo.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@134021 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-06-28 19:10:37 +00:00
Evan Cheng
15993f83a4 More refactoring. Move getRegClass from TargetOperandInfo to TargetInstrInfo.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@133944 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-06-27 21:26:13 +00:00
Bob Wilson
84c5eed15b This patch combines several changes from Evan Cheng for rdar://8659675.
Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is
difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons.
1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair
   of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause
   additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen
   vmul + vadd.
2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to
   stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart.
3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW
   vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either:
     vmul
     vadd
     vmla
   Instead, we want to expand the second vmla:
     vmla
     vmul
     vadd
   Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles
   faster.

Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough
but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to
use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable.

A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed.
B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to
   compute a fmul and a fmla.
C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into
   fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case).
D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards.
E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the
   vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards.

Enable these fp vmlx codegen changes for Cortex-A9.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@129775 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-04-19 18:11:57 +00:00
Evan Cheng
6557bce3ec VFP single precision arith instructions can go down to NEON pipeline, but on Cortex-A8 only.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@126238 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-02-22 19:53:14 +00:00
Evan Cheng
04e2b639c1 Eliminate unneeded #include's.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120971 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-05 23:41:43 +00:00
Evan Cheng
f79ed109ec Remove an unused variable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120964 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-05 23:03:35 +00:00
Evan Cheng
48575f6ea7 Making use of VFP / NEON floating point multiply-accumulate / subtraction is
difficult on current ARM implementations for a few reasons.
1. Even though a single vmla has latency that is one cycle shorter than a pair
   of vmul + vadd, a RAW hazard during the first (4? on Cortex-a8) can cause
   additional pipeline stall. So it's frequently better to single codegen
   vmul + vadd.
2. A vmla folowed by a vmul, vmadd, or vsub causes the second fp instruction to
   stall for 4 cycles. We need to schedule them apart.
3. A vmla followed vmla is a special case. Obvious issuing back to back RAW
   vmla + vmla is very bad. But this isn't ideal either:
     vmul
     vadd
     vmla
   Instead, we want to expand the second vmla:
     vmla
     vmul
     vadd
   Even with the 4 cycle vmul stall, the second sequence is still 2 cycles
   faster.

Up to now, isel simply avoid codegen'ing fp vmla / vmls. This works well enough
but it isn't the optimial solution. This patch attempts to make it possible to
use vmla / vmls in cases where it is profitable.

A. Add missing isel predicates which cause vmla to be codegen'ed.
B. Make sure the fmul in (fadd (fmul)) has a single use. We don't want to
   compute a fmul and a fmla.
C. Add additional isel checks for vmla, avoid cases where vmla is feeding into
   fp instructions (except for the #3 exceptional case).
D. Add ARM hazard recognizer to model the vmla / vmls hazards.
E. Add a special pre-regalloc case to expand vmla / vmls when it's likely the
   vmla / vmls will trigger one of the special hazards.

Work in progress, only A+B are enabled.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@120960 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-12-05 22:04:16 +00:00