This patch adds an optimization in CodeGenPrepare to move an extractelement
right before a store when the target can combine them.
The optimization may promote any scalar operations to vector operations in the
way to make that possible.
** Context **
Some targets use different register files for both vector and scalar operations.
This means that transitioning from one domain to another may incur copy from one
register file to another. These copies are not coalescable and may be expensive.
For example, according to the scheduling model, on cortex-A8 a vector to GPR
move is 20 cycles.
** Motivating Example **
Let us consider an example:
define void @foo(<2 x i32>* %addr1, i32* %dest) {
%in1 = load <2 x i32>* %addr1, align 8
%extract = extractelement <2 x i32> %in1, i32 1
%out = or i32 %extract, 1
store i32 %out, i32* %dest, align 4
ret void
}
As it is, this IR generates the following assembly on armv7:
vldr d16, [r0] @vector load
vmov.32 r0, d16[1] @ cross-register-file copy: 20 cycles
orr r0, r0, #1 @ scalar bitwise or
str r0, [r1] @ scalar store
bx lr
Whereas we could generate much faster code:
vldr d16, [r0] @ vector load
vorr.i32 d16, #0x1 @ vector bitwise or
vst1.32 {d16[1]}, [r1:32] @ vector extract + store
bx lr
Half of the computation made in the vector is useless, but this allows to get
rid of the expensive cross-register-file copy.
** Proposed Solution **
To avoid this cross-register-copy penalty, we promote the scalar operations to
vector operations. The penalty will be removed if we manage to promote the whole
chain of computation in the vector domain.
Currently, we do that only when the chain of computation ends by a store and the
target is able to combine an extract with a store.
Stores are the most likely candidates, because other instructions produce values
that would need to be promoted and so, extracted as some point[1]. Moreover,
this is customary that targets feature stores that perform a vector extract (see
AArch64 and X86 for instance).
The proposed implementation relies on the TargetTransformInfo to decide whether
or not it is beneficial to promote a chain of computation in the vector domain.
Unfortunately, this interface is rather inaccurate for this level of details and
although this optimization may be beneficial for X86 and AArch64, the inaccuracy
will lead to the optimization being too aggressive.
Basically in TargetTransformInfo, everything that is legal has a cost of 1,
whereas, even if a vector type is legal, usually a vector operation is slightly
more expensive than its scalar counterpart. That will lead to too many
promotions that may not be counter balanced by the saving of the
cross-register-file copy. For instance, on AArch64 this penalty is just 4
cycles.
For now, the optimization is just enabled for ARM prior than v8, since those
processors have a larger penalty on cross-register-file copies, and the scope is
limited to basic blocks. Because of these two factors, we limit the effects of
the inaccuracy. Indeed, I did not want to build up a fancy cost model with block
frequency and everything on top of that.
[1] We can imagine targets that can combine an extractelement with other
instructions than just stores. If we want to go into that direction, the current
interfaces must be augmented and, moreover, I think this becomes a global isel
problem.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5921
<rdar://problem/14170854>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220978 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
introduced in r217629.
We were returning the old sext instead of the new zext as the promoted instruction!
Thanks Joerg Sonnenberger for the test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@217800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The test being performed is just an approximation anyway, so it really
shouldn't crash when things don't go entirely as expected.
Should fix PR20474.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@214177 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r213474 (and r213475), which causes a miscompile on
a stage2 LTO build. I'll reply on the list in a moment.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213562 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: This patch introduces two new iterator ranges and updates existing code to use it. No functional change intended.
Test Plan: All tests (make check-all) still pass.
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4481
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213474 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Pass initialization requires to initialize TargetMachine for back-end
specific passes. This commit creates a new macro INITIALIZE_TM_PASS to
simplify this kind of initialization.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210641 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
compared to 'AddrMode.BaseReg'. In the case that 'AddrMode.BaseReg' is
nullptr, 'Result' will also be nullptr, so the cast causes an assertion. We
should use dyn_cast_or_null here to check 'Result' is not null and it is an
instruction.
Bug found by Mats Petersson, and I reduced his IR to get a test case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208705 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
buildbot - do not insert debug intrinsics before phi nodes.
Debug info for optimized code: Support variables that are on the stack and
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.
Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.
This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine.ll testcase and included source
rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207269 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
AllocaInst that was missing in one location.
Debug info for optimized code: Support variables that are on the stack and
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.
Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.
This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine.ll testcase and included source
rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207235 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
AllocaInst that was missing in one location.
Debug info for optimized code: Support variables that are on the stack and
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.
Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.
This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine.ll testcase and included source
rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207165 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.
Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.
This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine-intrinsics testcase and included source
rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207130 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206837 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
while checking candidate for bit field extract.
Otherwise the value may not fit in uint64_t and this will trigger an
assertion.
This fixes PR19503.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206834 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The current memory-instruction optimization logic in CGP, which sinks parts of
the address computation that can be adsorbed by the addressing mode, does this
by explicitly converting the relevant part of the address computation into
IR-level integer operations (making use of ptrtoint and inttoptr). For most
targets this is currently not a problem, but for targets wishing to make use of
IR-level aliasing analysis during CodeGen, the use of ptrtoint/inttoptr is a
problem for two reasons:
1. BasicAA becomes less powerful in the face of the ptrtoint/inttoptr
2. In cases where type-punning was used, and BasicAA was used
to override TBAA, BasicAA may no longer do so. (this had forced us to disable
all use of TBAA in CodeGen; something which we can now enable again)
This (use of GEPs instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr) is not currently enabled by
default (except for those targets that use AA during CodeGen), and so aside
from some PowerPC subtargets and SystemZ, there should be no change in
behavior. We may be able to switch completely away from the ptrtoint/inttoptr
sinking on all targets, but further testing is required.
I've doubled-up on a number of existing tests that are sensitive to the
address sinking behavior (including some store-merging tests that are
sensitive to the order of the resulting ADD operations at the SDAG level).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206092 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As it turns out the source of the sunkaddr can be a constant, in which case
there is not an instruction to delete, causing the cleanup code introduced in
r204833 to crash. This patch adds a dynamic check to ensure the deleted value is
in fact an instruction and not a constant.
Patch by Louis Gerbarg <lgg@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205941 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Given IR like:
%bit = and %val, #imm-with-1-bit-set
%tst = icmp %bit, 0
br i1 %tst, label %true, label %false
some targets can emit just a single instruction (tbz/tbnz in the
AArch64 case). However, with ISel acting at the basic-block level, all
three instructions need to be together for this to be possible.
This adds another transformation to CodeGenPrep to expose these
opportunities, if targets opt in via the hook.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In some cases it is possible for CGP to attempt to reuse a base address from
another basic block. In those cases we have to be sure that all the address
math was either done at the same bit width, or that none of it overflowed
before it was extended.
Patch by Louis Gerbarg <lgg@apple.com>
rdar://16307442
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204833 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This helps the instruction selector to lower an i64 * i64 -> i128
multiplication into a single instruction on targets which support it.
This is an update of D2973 which was reverted because of a bug reported
as PR19084.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, chapuni
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
CC: llvm-commits, alex, chapuni
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3021
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203797 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This helps the instruction selector to lower an i64 * i64 -> i128
multiplication into a single instruction on targets which support it.
Patch by Manuel Jacob.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
directly care about the Value class (it is templated so that the key can
be any arbitrary Value subclass), it is in fact concretely tied to the
Value class through the ValueHandle's CallbackVH interface which relies
on the key type being some Value subclass to establish the value handle
chain.
Ironically, the unittest is already in the right library.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202824 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
