dependence on DominanceFrontier. Instead, add an explicit DominanceFrontier
pass in StandardPasses.h to ensure that it gets scheduled at the right
time.
Declare that loop unrolling preserves ScalarEvolution, and shuffle some
getAnalysisUsages.
This eliminates one LoopSimplify and one LCCSA run in the standard
compile opts sequence.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@109413 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
different widths. In a use with a narrower fixup, formulae
may be wider than the fixup, in which case the high bits
aren't necessarily meaningful, so it isn't safe to reuse
them for uses with wider fixups.
This fixes PR7618, though the testcase is too large for a
reasonable regression test, since it heavily dependes on
hitting LSR's heuristics in a certain way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108455 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a zero. This situation arrises in Fortran code with induction variables
that start at 1 instead of 0. This fixes PR7651.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
by a return that returns a constant, while elsewhere in the function
another return instruction returns a different constant. This is a
special case of accumulator recursion, so just generalize the existing
logic a bit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108241 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the LHS and RHS of an and/or instruction, don't multiply add
known predecessor values. This fixes the crash on testcase
from PR7498
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
operation, but the way it's implemented requires the operation to also be
commutative. So add a check for commutativity (and tweak the corresponding
comments). This makes no difference in practice since every associative
LLVM instruction is also commutative! Here's an example to show the need
for commutativity: the accum_recursion.ll testcase calculates the factorial
function. Before the transformation the result of a call is
((((1*1)*2)*3)...)*x
while afterwards it is
(((1*x)*(x-1))...*2)*1
which clearly requires both associativity and commutativity of * to be equal
to the original.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@108056 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
have any effect, and second, deleting stores can potentially invalidate
an AliasAnalysis, and there's currently no notification for this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@107496 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
large integers, the first inserted value would always create
an 'or X, 0'. Even though this is trivially zapped by
instcombine, don't bother creating this pointless instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106979 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the returned value after the tail call if it differs from other return
values. The optimal thing to do would be to introduce a phi node for
the return value, but for the moment just fix the miscompile.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SCEVUnknown values which are loop-variant, as LSR can't do anything
interesting with these values in any case. This fixes very slow compile
times on loops which have large numbers of such values.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106897 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309. While
this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only
place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other
places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
enough special case, and it theoretically allows more folding because
it works even when x is unanalyzable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
