this would have been required because of the use of DataLayout, but that
has moved into the IR proper. It is still required because this folder
uses the constant folding in the analysis library (which uses the
datalayout) as the more aggressive basis of its folder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202832 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
directly care about the Value class (it is templated so that the key can
be any arbitrary Value subclass), it is in fact concretely tied to the
Value class through the ValueHandle's CallbackVH interface which relies
on the key type being some Value subclass to establish the value handle
chain.
Ironically, the unittest is already in the right library.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202824 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.
Another step of modularizing the support library.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202815 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
business.
This header includes Function and BasicBlock and directly uses the
interfaces of both classes. It has to do with the IR, it even has that
in the name. =] Put it in the library it belongs to.
This is one step toward making LLVM's Support library survive a C++
modules bootstrap.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202814 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
out-of-line so that it can refer to the methods on User. As
a consequence, this removes the need to define one template method if
value_use_iterator in the extremely strange User.h header (!!!).
This makse Use.h slightly less peculiar. The only remaining real
peculiarity is the definition of Use::set in Value.h
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202805 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
inconsistent both with itself and with LLVM at large with formatting.
The *s were on the wrong side, the indent was off, etc etc. This is much
cleaner.
Also, go clang-format laying out the array of tags in nice columns.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DWARF discriminators are used to distinguish multiple control flow paths
on the same source location. When this happens, instructions across
basic block boundaries will share the same debug location.
This pass detects this situation and creates a new lexical scope to one
of the two instructions. This lexical scope is a child scope of the
original and contains a new discriminator value. This discriminator is
then picked up from MCObjectStreamer::EmitDwarfLocDirective to be
written on the object file.
This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18270.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
remove_if that its predicate is adaptable. We don't actually need this,
we can write a generic adapter for any predicate.
This lets us remove some very wrong std::function usages. We should
never be using std::function for predicates to algorithms. This incurs
an *indirect* call overhead for every evaluation of the predicate, and
makes it very hard to inline through.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Breaks the MSVC build.
DataStream.cpp(44): error C2552: 'llvm::Statistic::Value' : non-aggregates cannot be initialized with initializer list
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With C++11 we finally have a standardized way to specify atomic operations. Use
them to replace the existing custom implemention. Sadly the translation is not
entirely trivial as std::atomic allows more fine-grained control over the
atomicity. I tried to preserve the old semantics as well as possible.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2915
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202730 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The shared library generated by autoconf will now be called
libLLVM-$(VERSION_MAJOR).$(VERSION_MINOR).$(VERSION_PATCH)$(VERSION_SUFFIX).so
and a symlink named
libLLVM-$(VERSION_MAJOR).$(VERSION_MINOR)$(VERSION_SUFFIX).so will
also be created in the install directory.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202720 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a constructor either. Just call the constructor directly. I'll look into
making this work with aggregate initialization some other time (when
I have someone with MSVC 2012 handy to test ideas).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202688 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
operand_values. The first provides a range view over operand Use
objects, and the second provides a range view over the Value*s being
used by those operands.
The naming is "STL-style" rather than "LLVM-style" because we have
historically named iterator methods STL-style, and range methods seem to
have far more in common with their iterator counterparts than with
"normal" APIs. Feel free to bikeshed on this one if you want, I'm happy
to change these around if people feel strongly.
I've switched code in SROA and LCG to exercise these mostly to ensure
they work correctly -- we don't really have an easy way to unittest this
and they're trivial.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202687 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
proposed std::iterator_pair which was in committee suggested to move
toward std::iterator_range. There isn't a formal paper yet, but there
seems little disagreement within the committee at this point so it seems
fine to provide our own version in the llvm namespace so we can easily
build range adaptors for the numerous iterators in LLVM's interfaces.
Note that I'm not really comfortable advocating a crazed range-based
migration just yet. The range stuff is still in a great deal of flux in
C++ and the committee hasn't entirely made up its mind (afaict) about
how it will work. So I'm mostly trying to provide the minimal
functionality needed to make writing easy and convenient range adaptors
for range based for loops easy and convenient. ;]
Subsequent patches will use this across the fundamental IR types, where
there are iterator views.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202686 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The interaction between defaulted operators and move elision isn't
totally obvious, add a unit test so it doesn't break unintentionally.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to the build being C++11.
There is clearly still plenty of simplification than can be done here by
using standard type traits instead of rolling our own in many places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202586 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
