I followed three heuristics for deciding whether to set 'true' or
'false':
- Everything target independent got 'true' as that is the expected
common output of the GCC builtins.
- If the target arch only has one way of implementing this operation,
set the flag in the way that exercises the most of codegen. For most
architectures this is also the likely path from a GCC builtin, with
'true' being set. It will (eventually) require lowering away that
difference, and then lowering to the architecture's operation.
- Otherwise, set the flag differently dependending on which target
operation should be tested.
Let me know if anyone has any issue with this pattern or would like
specific tests of another form. This should allow the x86 codegen to
just iteratively improve as I teach the backend how to differentiate
between the two forms, and everything else should remain exactly the
same.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@146370 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This also changes the syntax for llvm.bswap, llvm.part.set, llvm.part.select, and llvm.ct* intrinsics. They are automatically upgraded by both the LLVM ASM reader and the bitcode reader. The test cases have been updated, with special tests added to ensure the automatic upgrading is supported.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@40807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Update these test cases to use proper signatures for bswap which is now
and overloaded intrinsic. Its name must be of the form llvm.bswap.i32.i32
since both the parameter and the result or of type "iAny". Also, the
bit counting intrinsics changed to always return i32.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@35548 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
