Moving the DIFile parameter to immediately proceed the tag so that it will be a
common prefix with other DIScopes (once the DIFile is replaced with the raw
file/directory pair).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177492 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes DIType's first non-tag parameter the same as DIFile's, allowing them
to both share the common implementation of getFilename/getDirectory in DIScope.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177467 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177239 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the next step towards making the metadata for DIScopes have a common
prefix rather than having to delegate based on their tag type.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176913 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously we seemed to be assuming that all functions were definitions and all
methods were declarations. This may be consistent with how Clang uses DIBuilder
but doesn't have to be true of all clients (such as DragonEgg).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@175423 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main lists of debug info metadata attached to the compile_unit had an extra
layer of metadata nodes they went through for no apparent reason. This patch
removes that (& still passes just as much of the GDB 7.5 test suite). If anyone
can show evidence as to why these extra metadata nodes are there I'm open to
reverting this patch & documenting why they're there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@174266 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of a class. Emit static data member declarations and definitions
through correctly.
Part of PR14471.
Patch by Paul Robinson!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172590 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This works fine with GDB for member variable pointers, but GDB's support for
member function pointers seems to be quite unrelated to
DW_TAG_ptr_to_member_type. (see GDB bug 14998 for details)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171698 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171366 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Aside from moving the actual files, this patch only updates the build
system and the source file comments under lib/... that are relevant.
I'll be updating other docs and other files in smaller subsequnet
commits.
While I've tried to test this, but it is entirely possible that there
will still be some build system fallout.
Also, note that I've not changed the library name itself: libLLVMCore.a
is still the library name. I'd be interested in others' opinions about
whether we should rename this as well (I think we should, just not sure
what it might break)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
