- Still O(N^2), just a faster form, and now its the MCAsmLayout's fault.
On the .s I am tuning against (combine.s from 403.gcc):
--
ddunbar@lordcrumb:MC$ diff stats-before.txt stats-after.txt
5,10c5,10
< 1728 assembler - Number of assembler layout and relaxation steps
< 7707 assembler - Number of emitted assembler fragments
< 120588 assembler - Number of emitted object file bytes
< 2233448 assembler - Number of evaluated fixups
< 1727 assembler - Number of relaxed instructions
< 6723845 mcexpr - Number of MCExpr evaluations
---
> 3 assembler - Number of assembler layout and relaxation steps
> 7707 assembler - Number of emitted assembler fragments
> 120588 assembler - Number of emitted object file bytes
> 14796 assembler - Number of evaluated fixups
> 1727 assembler - Number of relaxed instructions
> 67889 mcexpr - Number of MCExpr evaluations
--
Feel free to LOL at the -before numbers, if you like.
I am a little surprised we make more than 2 relaxation passes. It's pretty
trivial for us to do relaxation out-of-order if that would give a speedup.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@99543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Also, drop the current location part of AsmLayout, I think I prefer to implement this via explicit symbols.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@98240 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
