using it to detect whether or not a terminal supports colors. This
replaces a particularly egregious hack that merely compared the TERM
environment variable to "dumb". That doesn't really translate to
a reasonable experience for users that have actually ensured their
terminal's capabilities are accurately reflected.
This makes testing a terminal for color support somewhat more expensive,
but it is called very rarely anyways. The important fast path when the
output is being piped somewhere is already in place.
The global lock may seem excessive, but the spec for calling into curses
is *terrible*. The whole library is terrible, and I spent quite a bit of
time looking for a better way of doing this before convincing myself
that this was the fundamentally correct way to behave. The damage of the
curses library is very narrowly confined, and we continue to use raw
escape codes for actually manipulating the colors which is a much sane
system than directly using curses here (IMO).
If this causes trouble for folks, please let me know. I've tested it on
Linux and will watch the bots carefully. I've also worked to account for
the variances of curses interfaces that I could finde documentation for,
but that may not have been sufficient.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@187874 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
leaving this undefined, and despite the sentence in the standard that
seems to require it, I'll cede the point and assume its a bug in the
wording. Other parts of POSIX regularly allow for things to be -1
instead of undefined, this should too. Makes things more consistent too.
This should have to real impact for folks though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
defines _POSIX_CPUTIME but doesn't support the clock_* functions.
I don't test the value of _POSIX_CPUTIME because the spec merely says
that if it is defined, the CPU-specific timers are available, whereas it
says that _POSIX_TIMERS must be defined and defined to a value greater
than zero. However, this may not work, as the POSIX spec clearly states:
"If the symbolic constant _POSIX_CPUTIME is defined, then the symbolic
constant _POSIX_TIMERS shall also be defined by the implementation to
have the value 200112L."
If this doesn't work, I'll add more hacks for Darwin.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171565 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
wall time, user time, and system time since a process started.
For walltime, we currently use TimeValue's interface and a global
initializer to compute a close approximation of total process runtime.
For user time, this adds support for an somewhat more precise timing
mechanism -- clock_gettime with the CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID clock
selected.
For system time, we have to do a full getrusage call to extract the
system time from the OS. This is expensive but unavoidable.
In passing, clean up the implementation of the old APIs and fix some
latent bugs in the Windows code. This might have manifested on Windows
ARM systems or other systems with strange 64-bit integer behavior.
The old API for this both user time and system time simultaneously from
a single getrusage call. While this results in fewer system calls, it
also results in a lower precision user time and if only user time is
desired, it introduces a higher overhead. It may be worthwhile to switch
some of the pass timers to not track system time and directly track user
and wall time. The old API also tracked walltime in a confusing way --
it just set it to the current walltime rather than providing any measure
of wall time since the process started the way buth user and system time
are tracked. The new API is more consistent here.
The plan is to eventually implement these methods for a *child* process
by using the wait3(2) system call to populate an rusage struct
representing the whole subprocess execution. That way, after waiting on
a child process its stats will become accurate and cheap to query.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171551 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Implement the old API in terms of the new one. This simplifies the
implementation on Windows which can now re-use the self_process's once
initialization.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171330 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix a truly odd namespace qualifier that was flat out wrong in the
process. The fully qualified namespace would have been
llvm::sys::TimeValue, llvm::TimeValue makes no sense.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171292 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The coding style used here is not LLVM's style because this is modeled
after a Boost interface and thus done in the style of a candidate C++
standard library interface. I'll probably end up proposing it as
a standard C++ library if it proves to be reasonably portable and
useful.
This is just the most basic parts of the interface -- getting the
process ID out of it. However, it helps sketch out some of the boiler
plate such as the base class, derived class, shared code, and static
factory function. It also introduces a unittest so that I can
incrementally ensure this stuff works.
However, I've not even compiled this code for Windows yet. I'll try to
fix any Windows fallout from the bots, and if I can't fix it I'll revert
and get someone on Windows to help out. There isn't a lot more that is
mandatory, so soon I'll switch to just stubbing out the Windows side and
get Michael Spencer to help with implementation as he can test it
directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171289 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To be used in printing unprintable source in clang diagnostics.
Patch by Seth Cantrell, with a minor fix for mingw by me.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154805 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
or Clang is using this, and it would be hard to use it correctly given
the thread hostility of the function. Also, it never checked the return
which is rather dangerous with chdir. If someone was in fact using this,
please let me know, as well as what the usecase actually is so that
I can add it back and make it more correct and secure to use. (That
said, it's never going to be "safe" per-se, but we could at least
document the risks...)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@148211 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
