Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Lattner
d2bf432b2b Upgrade syntax of tests using volatile instructions to use 'load volatile' instead of 'volatile load', which is archaic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2011-11-27 06:54:59 +00:00
Chris Lattner
159528702a The inliner has traditionally not considered call sites
that appear due to inlining a callee as candidates for
futher inlining, but a recent patch made it do this if
those call sites were indirect and became direct.

Unfortunately, in bizarre cases (see testcase) doing this
can cause us to infinitely inline mutually recursive
functions into callers not in the cycle.  Fix this by
keeping track of the inline history from which callsite
inline candidates got inlined from.

This shouldn't affect any "real world" code, but is required
for a follow on patch that is coming up next.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102822 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-05-01 01:05:10 +00:00
Chris Lattner
4b7b42c831 Dan recently disabled recursive inlining within a function, but we
were still inlining self-recursive functions into other functions.

Inlining a recursive function into itself has the potential to
reduce recursion depth by a factor of 2, inlining a recursive
function into something else reduces recursion depth by exactly 
1.  Since inlining a recursive function into something else is a
weird form of loop peeling, turn this off.

The deleted testcase was added by Dale in r62107, since then
we're leaning towards not inlining recursive stuff ever.  In any
case, if we like inlining recursive stuff, it should be done 
within the recursive function itself to get the algorithm 
recursion depth win.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@102798 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-04-30 22:37:22 +00:00