Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rafael Espindola
a23cc6a1ea Add r224985 back with fixes.
The fixes are to note that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local
relocations can be used. In particular, ld64 requires that relocations to
cstring/cfstrings use linker visible symbols.

Original message:

In an assembly expression like

bar:
  .long L0 + 1

the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.

In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.

The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.

In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.

This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.

This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226503 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-19 21:11:14 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
8327f0bca1 Revert "Add r224985 back with two fixes."
This reverts commit r225644 while I debug a regression.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@226022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-14 19:07:23 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
5512415ade Add r224985 back with two fixes.
One is that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local relocations can
be used. We have to take those into consideration when deciding to put a L
symbol in the symbol table or not.

The other is that ld64 requires the relocations to cstring to use linker
visible symbols on AArch64.

Thanks to Michael Zolotukhin for testing this!

Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.

In an assembly expression like

bar:
.long L0 + 1

the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.

In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.

The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.

In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.

This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.

This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225644 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-12 18:13:07 +00:00
Lang Hames
bce877c84c Revert r225048: It broke ObjC on AArch64.
I've filed http://llvm.org/PR22100 to track this issue.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225228 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-06 00:54:32 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
8093abb745 Add r224985 back with a fix.
The issues was that AArch64 has additional restrictions on when local
relocations can be used. We have to take those into consideration when
deciding to put a L symbol in the symbol table or not.

Original message:

Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.

In an assembly expression like

bar:
.long L0 + 1

the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.

In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.

The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.

In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.

This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.

This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225048 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-31 17:19:34 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
937e781f49 Revert "Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols."
This reverts commit r224985.

I am investigating why it made an Apple bot unhappy.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225044 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-31 16:06:48 +00:00
Rafael Espindola
65300b95e6 Remove doesSectionRequireSymbols.
In an assembly expression like

bar:
.long L0 + 1

the intended semantics is that bar will contain a pointer one byte past L0.

In sections that are merged by content (strings, 4 byte constants, etc), a
single position in the section doesn't give the linker enough information.
For example, it would not be able to tell a relocation must point to the
end of a string, since that would look just like the start of the next.

The solution used in ELF to use relocation with symbols if there is a non-zero
addend.

In MachO before this patch we would just keep all symbols in some sections.

This would miss some cases (only cstrings on x86_64 were implemented) and was
inefficient since most relocations have an addend of 0 and can be represented
without the symbol.

This patch implements the non-zero addend logic for MachO too.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224985 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-30 13:13:27 +00:00