Commit Graph

6131 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adrian Prantl
7e44a65e6b Revert "Reapply: Teach SROA how to update debug info for fragmented variables."
This reverts commit r225379 while investigating an assertion failure reported
by Alexey.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-08 02:02:00 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
50bf54ccf4 Reapply: Teach SROA how to update debug info for fragmented variables.
The two buildbot failures were addressed in LLVM r225378 and CFE r225359.

This rapplies commit 225272 without modifications.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225379 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-07 20:52:22 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
d2c42b9617 Revert "Reapply: Teach SROA how to update debug info for fragmented variables."
because of a tsan buildbot failure.
This reverts commit 225272.

Fix should be coming soon.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-06 19:47:27 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
46cb54c0fb Reapply: Teach SROA how to update debug info for fragmented variables.
This also rolls in the changes discussed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D6766.
Defers migrating the debug info for new allocas until after all partitions
are created.

Thanks to Chandler for reviewing!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225272 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-06 17:14:10 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
4f9a7277d1 [SROA] Apply a somewhat heavy and unpleasant hammer to fix PR22093, an
assert out of the new pre-splitting in SROA.

This fix makes the code do what was originally intended -- when we have
a store of a load both dealing in the same alloca, we force them to both
be pre-split with identical offsets. This is really quite hard to do
because we can keep discovering problems as we go along. We have to
track every load over the current alloca which for any resaon becomes
invalid for pre-splitting, and go back to remove all stores of those
loads. I've included a couple of test cases derived from PR22093 that
cover the different ways this can happen. While that PR only really
triggered the first of these two, its the same fundamental issue.

The other challenge here is documented in a FIXME now. We end up being
quite a bit more aggressive for pre-splitting when loads and stores
don't refer to the same alloca. This aggressiveness comes at the cost of
introducing potentially redundant loads. It isn't clear that this is the
right balance. It might be considerably better to require that we only
do pre-splitting when we can presplit every load and store involved in
the entire operation. That would give more consistent if conservative
results. Unfortunately, it requires a non-trivial change to the actual
pre-splitting operation in order to correctly handle cases where we end
up pre-splitting stores out-of-order. And it isn't 100% clear that this
is the right direction, although I'm starting to suspect that it is.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225149 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-05 04:17:53 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
5a9cd4d44e [PM] Split the AssumptionTracker immutable pass into two separate APIs:
a cache of assumptions for a single function, and an immutable pass that
manages those caches.

The motivation for this change is two fold. Immutable analyses are
really hacks around the current pass manager design and don't exist in
the new design. This is usually OK, but it requires that the core logic
of an immutable pass be reasonably partitioned off from the pass logic.
This change does precisely that. As a consequence it also paves the way
for the *many* utility functions that deal in the assumptions to live in
both pass manager worlds by creating an separate non-pass object with
its own independent API that they all rely on. Now, the only bits of the
system that deal with the actual pass mechanics are those that actually
need to deal with the pass mechanics.

Once this separation is made, several simplifications become pretty
obvious in the assumption cache itself. Rather than using a set and
callback value handles, it can just be a vector of weak value handles.
The callers can easily skip the handles that are null, and eventually we
can wrap all of this up behind a filter iterator.

For now, this adds boiler plate to the various passes, but this kind of
boiler plate will end up making it possible to port these passes to the
new pass manager, and so it will end up factored away pretty reasonably.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-04 12:03:27 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
ce7f347da2 [SROA] Teach SROA to be more aggressive in splitting now that we have
a pre-splitting pass over loads and stores.

Historically, splitting could cause enough problems that I hamstrung the
entire process with a requirement that splittable integer loads and
stores must cover the entire alloca. All smaller loads and stores were
unsplittable to prevent chaos from ensuing. With the new pre-splitting
logic that does load/store pair splitting I introduced in r225061, we
can now very nicely handle arbitrarily splittable loads and stores. In
order to fully benefit from these smarts, we need to mark all of the
integer loads and stores as splittable.

However, we don't actually want to rewrite partitions with all integer
loads and stores marked as splittable. This will fail to extract scalar
integers from aggregates, which is kind of the point of SROA. =] In
order to resolve this, what we really want to do is only do
pre-splitting on the alloca slices with integer loads and stores fully
splittable. This allows us to uncover all non-integer uses of the alloca
that would benefit from a split in an integer load or store (and where
introducing the split is safe because it is just memory transfer from
a load to a store). Once done, we make all the non-whole-alloca integer
loads and stores unsplittable just as they have historically been,
repartition and rewrite.

The result is that when there are integer loads and stores anywhere
within an alloca (such as from a memcpy of a sub-object of a larger
object), we can split them up if there are non-integer components to the
aggregate hiding beneath. I've added the challenging test cases to
demonstrate how this is able to promote to scalars even a case where we
have even *partially* overlapping loads and stores.

This restores the single-store behavior for small arrays of i8s which is
really nice. I've restored both the little endian testing and big endian
testing for these exactly as they were prior to r225061. It also forced
me to be more aggressive in an alignment test to actually defeat SROA.
=] Without the added volatiles there, we actually split up the weird i16
loads and produce nice double allocas with better alignment.

This also uncovered a number of bugs where we failed to handle
splittable load and store slices which didn't have a begininng offset of
zero. Those fixes are included, and without them the existing test cases
explode in glorious fireworks. =]

I've kept support for leaving whole-alloca integer loads and stores as
splittable even for the purpose of rewriting, but I think that's likely
no longer needed. With the new pre-splitting, we might be able to remove
all the splitting support for loads and stores from the rewriter. Not
doing that in this patch to try to isolate any performance regressions
that causes in an easy to find and revert chunk.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225074 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-02 03:55:54 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
888ee76367 [SROA] Make the computation of adjusted pointers not leak GEP
instructions.

I noticed this when working on dialing up how aggressively we can
pre-split loads and stores. My test case wasn't passing because dead
GEPs into the allocas persisted when they were built by this routine.
This isn't terribly harmful, we still rewrote and promoted the alloca
and I can't conceive of how to cause this to happen in a case where we
will keep the exact same alloca but rewrite and promote the uses of it.
If that ever happened, we'd get an assert out of mem2reg.

So I don't have a direct test case yet, but the subsequent commit's test
case wouldn't pass without this. There are other problems fixed by this
patch that I spotted purely by inspection such as the fact that
getAdjustedPtr could have actually deleted dead base pointers. I don't
know how to get a base pointer to go into getAdjustedPtr today, so
I think this bug could never have manifested (and I certainly can't
write a test case for it) but, it wasn't the intent of the code. The
code really just wanted to GC the new instructions built. That can be
done more directly by comparing with the base pointer which is the only
non-new instruction that this code can return.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-02 02:47:38 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
987c1f8ee7 [SROA] Fix the loop exit placement to be prior to indexing the splits
array. This prevents it from walking out of bounds on the splits array.

Bug found with the existing tests by ASan and by the MSVC debug build.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225069 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-02 00:10:22 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
ed3f2c6761 [SROA] Fix two total think-os in r225061 that should have been caught on
a +asserts bootstrap, but my bootstrap had asserts off. Oops.

Anyways, in some places it is reasonable to cast (as a sanity check) the
pointer operand to a load or store to an instruction within SROA --
namely when the pointer operand is expected to be derived from an
alloca, and thus always an instruction. However, the pre-splitting code
also deals with loads and stores to non-alloca pointers and there we
need to just use the Value*. Nothing about the code relied on the
instruction cast, it was only there essentially as an invariant
assertion. Remove the two that don't actually hold.

This should fix the proximate issue in PR22080, but I'm also doing an
asserts bootstrap myself to see if there are other issues lurking.

I'll craft a reduced test case in a moment, but I wanted to get the tree
healthy as quickly as possible.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225068 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-01 23:26:16 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
2f1e3d88b7 [SROA] Switch to using a more direct debug logging technique in one part
of my new load and store splitting, and fix a bug where it logged
a totally irrelevant slice rather than the actual slice in question.

The logging here previously worked because we used to place new slices
onto the back of the core sequence, but that caused other problems.
I updated the actual code to store new slices in their own vector but
didn't update the logging. There isn't a good way to reuse the logging
any more, and frankly it wasn't needed. We can directly log this bit
more easily.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225063 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-01 12:56:47 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
8785c31033 [SROA] Fix formatting with clang-format which I managed to fail to do
prior to committing r225061. Sorry for that.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225062 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-01 12:01:03 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
450b39e971 [SROA] Teach SROA how to much more intelligently handle split loads and
stores.

When there are accesses to an entire alloca with an integer
load or store as well as accesses to small pieces of the alloca, SROA
splits up the large integer accesses. In order to do that, it uses bit
math to merge the small accesses into large integers. While this is
effective, it produces insane IR that can cause significant problems in
the rest of the optimizer:

- It can cause load and store mismatches with GVN on the non-alloca side
  where we end up loading an i64 (or some such) rather than loading
  specific elements that are stored.
- We can't always get rid of the integer bit math, which is why we can't
  always fix the loads and stores to work well with GVN.
- This is especially bad when we have operations that mix poorly with
  integer bit math such as floating point operations.
- It will block things like the vectorizer which might be able to handle
  the scalar stores that underly the aggregate.

At the same time, we can't just directly split up these loads and stores
in all cases. If there is actual integer arithmetic involved on the
values, then using integer bit math is actually the perfect lowering
because we can often combine it heavily with the surrounding math.

The solution this patch provides is to find places where SROA is
partitioning aggregates into small elements, and look for splittable
loads and stores that it can split all the way to some other adjacent
load and store. These are uniformly the cases where failing to split the
loads and stores hurts the optimizer that I have seen, and I've looked
extensively at the code produced both from more and less aggressive
approaches to this problem.

However, it is quite tricky to actually do this in SROA. We may have
loads and stores to the same alloca, or other complex patterns that are
hard to handle. This complexity leads to the somewhat subtle algorithm
implemented here. We have to do this entire process as a separate pass
over the partitioning of the alloca, and split up all of the loads prior
to splitting the stores so that we can handle safely the cases of
overlapping, including partially overlapping, loads and stores to the
same alloca. We also have to reconstitute the post-split slice
configuration so we can avoid iterating again over all the alloca uses
(the slow part of SROA). But we also have to ensure that when we split
up loads and stores to *other* allocas, we *do* re-iterate over them in
SROA to adapt to the more refined partitioning now required.

With this, I actually think we can fix a long-standing TODO in SROA
where I avoided splitting as many loads and stores as probably should be
splittable. This limitation historically mitigated the fallout of all
the bad things mentioned above. Now that we have more intelligent
handling, I plan to remove the FIXME and more aggressively mark integer
loads and stores as splittable. I'll do that in a follow-up patch to
help with bisecting any fallout.

The net result of this change should be more fine-grained and accurate
scalars being formed out of aggregates. At the very least, Clang now
generates perfect code for this high-level test case using
std::complex<float>:

  #include <complex>

  void g1(std::complex<float> &x, float a, float b) {
    x += std::complex<float>(a, b);
  }
  void g2(std::complex<float> &x, float a, float b) {
    x -= std::complex<float>(a, b);
  }

  void foo(const std::complex<float> &x, float a, float b,
           std::complex<float> &x1, std::complex<float> &x2) {
    std::complex<float> l1 = x;
    g1(l1, a, b);
    std::complex<float> l2 = x;
    g2(l2, a, b);
    x1 = l1;
    x2 = l2;
  }

This code isn't just hypothetical either. It was reduced out of the hot
inner loops of essentially every part of the Eigen math library when
using std::complex<float>. Those loops would consistently and
pervasively hop between the floating point unit and the integer unit due
to bit math extraction and insertion of floating point values that were
"stored" in a 64-bit integer register around the loop backedge.

So far, this change has passed a bootstrap and I have done some other
testing and so far, no issues. That doesn't mean there won't be though,
so I'll be prepared to help with any fallout. If you performance swings
in particular, please let me know. I'm very curious what all the impact
of this change will be. Stay tuned for the follow-up to also split more
integer loads and stores.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@225061 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2015-01-01 11:54:38 +00:00
Philip Reames
1714ad67bd Refine the notion of MayThrow in LICM to include a header specific version
In LICM, we have a check for an instruction which is guaranteed to execute and thus can't introduce any new faults if moved to the preheader. To handle a function which might unconditionally throw when first called, we check for any potentially throwing call in the loop and give up.

This is unfortunate when the potentially throwing condition is down a rare path. It prevents essentially all LICM of potentially faulting instructions where the faulting condition is checked outside the loop. It also greatly diminishes the utility of loop unswitching since control dependent instructions - which are now likely in the loops header block - will not be lifted by subsequent LICM runs.

define void @nothrow_header(i64 %x, i64 %y, i1 %cond) {
; CHECK-LABEL: nothrow_header
; CHECK-LABEL: entry
; CHECK: %div = udiv i64 %x, %y
; CHECK-LABEL: loop
; CHECK: call void @use(i64 %div)
entry:
  br label %loop
loop: ; preds = %entry, %for.inc
  %div = udiv i64 %x, %y
  br i1 %cond, label %loop-if, label %exit
loop-if:
  call void @use(i64 %div)
  br label %loop
exit:
  ret void
}

The current patch really only helps with non-memory instructions (i.e. divs, etc..) since the maythrow call down the rare path will be considered to alias an otherwise hoistable load.  The one exception is that it does kick in for loads which are known to be invariant without regard to other possible stores, i.e. those marked with either !invarant.load metadata of tbaa 'is constant memory' metadata.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6725



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224965 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-29 23:00:57 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
43e17cfe85 [SROA] Update the documentation and names for accessing the slices
within a partition of an alloca in SROA.

This reflects the fact that the organization of the slices isn't really
ideal for analysis, but is the naive way in which the slices are
available while we're processing them in the core partitioning
algorithm.

It is possible we could improve matters, and I've left a FIXME with
one of my ideas for how to do this, but it is a lot of work, the benefit
is somewhat minor, and it isn't clear that it would be strictly better.
=/ Not really satisfying, but I'm out of really good ideas.

This also improves one place where the debug logging failed to mark some
split partitions. Now we log in one place, slightly later, and with
accurate information about whether the slice is split by the partition
being rewritten.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-24 01:48:09 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
c807870534 [SROA] Refactor the integer and vector promotion testing logic to
operate in terms of the new Partition class, and generally have a more
clear set of arguments. No functionality changed.

The most notable improvements here are consistently using the
terminology of 'partition' for a collection of slices that will be
rewritten together and 'slice' for a region of an alloca that is used by
a particular instruction.

This also makes it more clear that the split things are actually slices
as well, just ones that will be split by the proposed partition.

This doesn't yet address the confusing aspects of the partition's
interface where slices that will be split by the partition and start
prior to the partition are accesssed via Partition::splitSlices() while
the core range of slices exposed by a Partition includes both unsplit
slices and slices which will be split by the end, but started within the
offset range of the partition. This is particularly hard to address
because the algorithm which computes partitions quite literally doesn't
know which slices these will end up being until too late. I'm looking at
whether I can fix that or not, but I'm not optimistic. I'll update the
comments and/or names to further explain this either way. I've also
added one FIXME in this patch relating to this confusion so that I don't
forget about it.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224798 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-24 01:05:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
d4510005df Revert r224739: Debug info: Teach SROA how to update debug info for
fragmented variables.

This caused codegen to start crashing when we built somewhat large
programs with debug info and optimizations. 'check-msan' hit in, and
I suspect a bootstrap would as well. I mailed a test case to the
review thread.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224750 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-23 02:58:14 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
67924e9af8 [SROA] Lift the logic for traversing the alloca slices one partition at
a time into a partition iterator and a Partition class.

There is a lot of knock-on simplification that this enables, largely
stemming from having a Partition object to refer to in lots of helpers.
I've only done a minimal amount of that because enoguh stuff is changing
as-is in this commit.

This shouldn't change any observable behavior. I've worked hard to
preserve the *exact* traversal semantics which were originally present
even though some of them make no sense. I'll be changing some of this in
subsequent commits now that the logic is carefully factored into
a reusable place.

The primary motivation for this change is to break the rewriting into
phases in order to support more intelligent rewriting. For example, I'm
planning to change how split loads and stores are rewritten to remove
the significant overuse of integer bit packing in the resulting code and
allow more effective secondary splitting of aggregates. For any of this
to work, they have to share the exact traversal logic.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-22 22:46:00 +00:00
Bruno Cardoso Lopes
a559a2317c [LCSSA] Handle PHI insertion in disjoint loops
Take two disjoint Loops L1 and L2.

LoopSimplify fails to simplify some loops (e.g. when indirect branches
are involved). In such situations, it can happen that an exit for L1 is
the header of L2. Thus, when we create PHIs in one of such exits we are
also inserting PHIs in L2 header.

This could break LCSSA form for L2 because these inserted PHIs can also
have uses in L2 exits, which are never handled in the current
implementation. Provide a fix for this corner case and test that we
don't assert/crash on that.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6624

rdar://problem/19166231

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-22 22:35:46 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
e5ca21a2df Debug info: Teach SROA how to update debug info for fragmented variables.
This allows us to generate debug info for extremely advanced code such as

  typedef struct { long int a; int b;} S;

  int foo(S s) {
    return s.b;
  }

which at -O1 on x86_64 is codegen'd into

  define i32 @foo(i64 %s.coerce0, i32 %s.coerce1) #0 {
    ret i32 %s.coerce1, !dbg !24
  }

with this patch we emit the following debug info for this

  TAG_formal_parameter [3]
    AT_location( 0x00000000
                 0x0000000000000000 - 0x0000000000000006: rdi, piece 0x00000008, rsi, piece 0x00000004
                 0x0000000000000006 - 0x0000000000000008: rdi, piece 0x00000008, rax, piece 0x00000004 )
                 AT_name( "s" )
                 AT_decl_file( "/Volumes/Data/llvm/_build.ninja.release/test.c" )

Thanks to chandlerc, dblaikie, and echristo for their feedback on all
previous iterations of this patch!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224739 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-22 22:26:00 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
93e03df3cf [SROA] Run clang-format over the entire SROA pass as I wrote it before
much of the glory of clang-format, and now any time I touch it I risk
introducing formatting changes as part of a functional commit.

Also, clang-format is *way* better at formatting my code than I am.
Most of this is a huge improvement although I reverted a couple of
places where I hit a clang-format bug with lambdas that has been filed
but not (fully) fixed.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224666 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-20 02:39:18 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
9ac193609f [SROA] Cleanup - remove the use of std::mem_fun_ref nonsense and use
a lambda now that we have them.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224500 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-18 05:19:47 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky
2f6d42351a Sink store based on alias analysis
- by Ella Bolshinsky
The alias analysis is used define whether the given instruction
is a barrier for store sinking. For 2 identical stores, following
instructions are checked in the both basic blocks, to determine
whether they are sinking barriers.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D6420



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224247 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-15 14:09:53 +00:00
Chad Rosier
5400fd6d79 [Reassociate] Use dbgs() instead of errs().
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-12 14:44:12 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
dad20b2ae2 IR: Split Metadata from Value
Split `Metadata` away from the `Value` class hierarchy, as part of
PR21532.  Assembly and bitcode changes are in the wings, but this is the
bulk of the change for the IR C++ API.

I have a follow-up patch prepared for `clang`.  If this breaks other
sub-projects, I apologize in advance :(.  Help me compile it on Darwin
I'll try to fix it.  FWIW, the errors should be easy to fix, so it may
be simpler to just fix it yourself.

This breaks the build for all metadata-related code that's out-of-tree.
Rest assured the transition is mechanical and the compiler should catch
almost all of the problems.

Here's a quick guide for updating your code:

  - `Metadata` is the root of a class hierarchy with three main classes:
    `MDNode`, `MDString`, and `ValueAsMetadata`.  It is distinct from
    the `Value` class hierarchy.  It is typeless -- i.e., instances do
    *not* have a `Type`.

  - `MDNode`'s operands are all `Metadata *` (instead of `Value *`).

  - `TrackingVH<MDNode>` and `WeakVH` referring to metadata can be
    replaced with `TrackingMDNodeRef` and `TrackingMDRef`, respectively.

    If you're referring solely to resolved `MDNode`s -- post graph
    construction -- just use `MDNode*`.

  - `MDNode` (and the rest of `Metadata`) have only limited support for
    `replaceAllUsesWith()`.

    As long as an `MDNode` is pointing at a forward declaration -- the
    result of `MDNode::getTemporary()` -- it maintains a side map of its
    uses and can RAUW itself.  Once the forward declarations are fully
    resolved RAUW support is dropped on the ground.  This means that
    uniquing collisions on changing operands cause nodes to become
    "distinct".  (This already happened fairly commonly, whenever an
    operand went to null.)

    If you're constructing complex (non self-reference) `MDNode` cycles,
    you need to call `MDNode::resolveCycles()` on each node (or on a
    top-level node that somehow references all of the nodes).  Also,
    don't do that.  Metadata cycles (and the RAUW machinery needed to
    construct them) are expensive.

  - An `MDNode` can only refer to a `Constant` through a bridge called
    `ConstantAsMetadata` (one of the subclasses of `ValueAsMetadata`).

    As a side effect, accessing an operand of an `MDNode` that is known
    to be, e.g., `ConstantInt`, takes three steps: first, cast from
    `Metadata` to `ConstantAsMetadata`; second, extract the `Constant`;
    third, cast down to `ConstantInt`.

    The eventual goal is to introduce `MDInt`/`MDFloat`/etc. and have
    metadata schema owners transition away from using `Constant`s when
    the type isn't important (and they don't care about referring to
    `GlobalValue`s).

    In the meantime, I've added transitional API to the `mdconst`
    namespace that matches semantics with the old code, in order to
    avoid adding the error-prone three-step equivalent to every call
    site.  If your old code was:

        MDNode *N = foo();
        bar(isa             <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(0)));
        baz(cast            <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(1)));
        bak(cast_or_null    <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(2)));
        bat(dyn_cast        <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(3)));
        bay(dyn_cast_or_null<ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(4)));

    you can trivially match its semantics with:

        MDNode *N = foo();
        bar(mdconst::hasa               <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(0)));
        baz(mdconst::extract            <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(1)));
        bak(mdconst::extract_or_null    <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(2)));
        bat(mdconst::dyn_extract        <ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(3)));
        bay(mdconst::dyn_extract_or_null<ConstantInt>(N->getOperand(4)));

    and when you transition your metadata schema to `MDInt`:

        MDNode *N = foo();
        bar(isa             <MDInt>(N->getOperand(0)));
        baz(cast            <MDInt>(N->getOperand(1)));
        bak(cast_or_null    <MDInt>(N->getOperand(2)));
        bat(dyn_cast        <MDInt>(N->getOperand(3)));
        bay(dyn_cast_or_null<MDInt>(N->getOperand(4)));

  - A `CallInst` -- specifically, intrinsic instructions -- can refer to
    metadata through a bridge called `MetadataAsValue`.  This is a
    subclass of `Value` where `getType()->isMetadataTy()`.

    `MetadataAsValue` is the *only* class that can legally refer to a
    `LocalAsMetadata`, which is a bridged form of non-`Constant` values
    like `Argument` and `Instruction`.  It can also refer to any other
    `Metadata` subclass.

(I'll break all your testcases in a follow-up commit, when I propagate
this change to assembly.)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223802 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-09 18:38:53 +00:00
Tom Stellard
857550322c StructurizeCFG: Use LoopInfo analysis for better loop detection
We were assuming that each back-edge in a region represented a unique
loop, which is not always the case.  We need to use LoopInfo to
correctly determine which back-edges are loops.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223199 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-03 04:28:32 +00:00
Bruno Cardoso Lopes
8fc3ffbb74 [LICM] Avoind store sinking if no preheader is available
Load instructions are inserted into loop preheaders when sinking stores
and later removed if not used by the SSA updater. Avoid sinking if the
loop has no preheader and avoid crashes. This fixes one more side effect
of not handling indirectbr instructions properly on LoopSimplify.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-12-02 14:22:34 +00:00
Bruno Cardoso Lopes
69ed1ff9b3 [LICM] Store sink and indirectbr instructions
Loop simplify skips exit-block insertion when exits contain indirectbr
instructions. This leads to an assertion in LICM when trying to sink
stores out of non-dedicated loop exits containing indirectbr
instructions. This patch fix this issue by re-checking for dedicated
exits in LICM prior to store sink attempts.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6414

rdar://problem/18943047

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222927 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-28 19:47:46 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
a87c35420b Revert r220349 to re-instate r220277 with a fix for PR21330 -- quite
clearly only exactly equal width ptrtoint and inttoptr casts are no-op
casts, it says so right there in the langref. Make the code agree.

Original log from r220277:
Teach the load analysis to allow finding available values which require
inttoptr or ptrtoint cast provided there is datalayout available.
Eventually, the datalayout can just be required but in practice it will
always be there today.

To go with the ability to expose available values requiring a ptrtoint
or inttoptr cast, helpers are added to perform one of these three casts.

These smarts are necessary to finish canonicalizing loads and stores to
the operational type requirements without regressing fundamental
combines.

I've added some test cases. These should actually improve as the load
combining and store combining improves, but they may fundamentally be
highlighting some missing combines for select in addition to exercising
the specific added logic to load analysis.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222739 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-25 08:20:27 +00:00
David Majnemer
dac753cb73 This Reassociate change unintentionally slipped in r222499
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222500 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-21 02:37:38 +00:00
David Majnemer
9970214474 SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors
The alloca's type is irrelevant, only those types which are used in a
load or store of the exact size of the slice should be considered.

This manifested as an assertion failure when we compared the various
types: we had a size mismatch.

This fixes PR21480.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00
Chad Rosier
503ec9826c Revert "[Reassociate] As the expression tree is rewritten make sure the operands are"
This reverts commit r222142.  This is causing/exposing an execution-time regression
in spec2006/gcc and coremark on AArch64/A57/Ofast.

Conflicts:

	test/Transforms/Reassociate/optional-flags.ll

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222398 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-19 23:21:20 +00:00
Arnaud A. de Grandmaison
beeec3231e Fix tail recursion elimination
When the BasicBlock containing the return instrution has a PHI with 2
incoming values, FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch will remove the no longer
used incoming value and remove the no longer needed phi as well. This
leaves us with a BB that no longer has a PHI, but the subsequent call
to FoldReturnIntoUncondBranch from FoldReturnAndProcessPred will not
remove the return instruction (which still uses the result of the call
instruction). This prevents EliminateRecursiveTailCall to remove
the value, as it is still being used in a basicblock which has no
predecessors.

The basicblock can not be erased on the spot, because its iterator is
still being used in runTRE.

This issue was exposed when removing the threshold on size for lifetime
marker insertion for named temporaries in clang. The testcase is a much
reduced version of peelOffOuterExpr(const Expr*, const ExplodedNode *)
from clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222354 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-19 13:32:51 +00:00
David Blaikie
5401ba7099 Update SetVector to rely on the underlying set's insert to return a pair<iterator, bool>
This is to be consistent with StringSet and ultimately with the standard
library's associative container insert function.

This lead to updating SmallSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update SmallPtrSet::insert to return pair<iterator, bool>,
and then to update all the existing users of those functions...

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222334 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-19 07:49:26 +00:00
Hao Liu
eb52f383c2 [SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP] Allow SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP pass to lower GEPs.
If LowerGEP is enabled, it can lower a GEP with multiple indices into GEPs with a single index
or arithmetic operations. Lowering GEPs can always extract structure indices. Lowering GEPs can
also give use more optimization opportunities. It can benefit passes like CSE, LICM and CGP.

Reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5864


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-19 06:24:44 +00:00
Manman Ren
2b82868de5 Revert r222039 because of bot failure.
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-Rlto_master/298/
Hopefully, bot will be green. If not, we will re-submit the commit.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222287 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-19 00:13:26 +00:00
Chad Rosier
3980c542e6 [Reassociate] Rename local variable to not use same name as a member
variable. NFC.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222248 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-18 20:21:54 +00:00
Philip Reames
0814bd85dd Tweak EarlyCSE to recognize series of dead stores
EarlyCSE is giving up on the current instruction immediately when it recognizes that the current instruction makes a previous store trivially dead. There's no reason to do this. Once the previous store has been deleted, it's perfectly legal to remember the value of the current store (for value forwarding) and the fact the store occurred (it could be dead too!).

Reviewed by: Hal
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6301



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222241 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-18 17:46:32 +00:00
David Majnemer
1ade0f0faa IndVarSimplify: Allow LFTR to fire more often
I added a pessimization in r217102 to prevent miscompiles when the
incremented induction variable was used in a comparison; it would be
poison.

Try to use the incremented induction variable more often when we can be
sure that the increment won't end in poison.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6222

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-18 02:20:58 +00:00
Chad Rosier
14915fe523 [Reassociate] As the expression tree is rewritten make sure the operands are
emitted in canonical form.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-17 16:33:50 +00:00
Chad Rosier
ae3738f4a7 [Reassociate] Canonicalize constants to RHS operand.
Fix a thinko where the RHS was already a constant.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-17 15:52:51 +00:00
Chad Rosier
1523db7c64 Reapply r221924: "[GVN] Perform Scalar PRE on gep indices that feed loads before
doing Load PRE"

This commit updates the failing test in
Analysis/TypeBasedAliasAnalysis/gvn-nonlocal-type-mismatch.ll

The failing test is sensitive to the order in which we process loads.  This
version turns on the RPO traversal instead of the while DT traversal in GVN.
The new test code is functionally same just the order of loads that are
eliminated is swapped.

This new version also fixes an issue where GVN splits a critical edge and
potentially invalidate the RPO/DT iterator.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222039 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-14 21:09:13 +00:00
Chad Rosier
5c76b3d03e [Reassociate] Canonicalize the operands of all binary operators.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222008 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-14 17:09:19 +00:00
Chad Rosier
1298a29c64 [Reassociate] Canonicalize operands of vector binary operators.
Prior to this commit fmul and fadd binary operators were being canonicalized for
both scalar and vector versions.  We now canonicalize add, mul, and, or, and xor
vector instructions.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222006 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-14 17:08:15 +00:00
Chad Rosier
7e61b1fb62 [Reassociate] Canonicalize constants to RHS operand.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222005 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-14 17:05:59 +00:00
Chad Rosier
1945dcff86 [Reassociate] Improve rank debug information. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221999 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-14 15:01:38 +00:00
Chad Rosier
7984fde2dc Revert "[GVN] Perform Scalar PRE on gep indices that feed loads before doing Load PRE."
This reverts commit r221924.  It appears the commit was a bit premature and is causing
bot failures that need further investigation.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221939 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-13 22:54:59 +00:00
Chad Rosier
a9cc4e7e35 [GVN] Perform Scalar PRE on gep indices that feed loads before doing Load PRE.
Phabricator Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6103
Patch by "Balaram Makam" <bmakam@codeaurora.org>!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221924 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-13 21:17:58 +00:00
Chad Rosier
ddf4026dd8 [Reassociate] Update comment. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221894 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-13 15:40:20 +00:00
Jingyue Wu
83c8e732dd Disable indvar widening if arithmetics on the wider type are more expensive
Summary:
Reapply r221772. The old patch breaks the bot because the @indvar_32_bit test
was run whether NVPTX was enabled or not.

IndVarSimplify should not widen an indvar if arithmetics on the wider
indvar are more expensive than those on the narrower indvar. For
instance, although NVPTX64 treats i64 as a legal type, an ADD on i64 is
twice as expensive as that on i32, because the hardware needs to
simulate a 64-bit integer using two 32-bit integers.

Split from D6188, and based on D6195 which adds NVPTXTargetTransformInfo.

Fixes PR21148.

Test Plan:
Added @indvar_32_bit that verifies we do not widen an indvar if the arithmetics
on the wider type are more expensive. This test is run only when NVPTX is
enabled.

Reviewers: jholewinski, eliben, meheff, atrick

Reviewed By: atrick

Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6196



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-11-12 18:09:15 +00:00