For targets that have instruction itineraries this means no change. Targets
that move over to the new schedule model will use be able the new schedule
module for instruction latencies in the if-converter (the logic is such that if
there is no itineary we will use the new sched model for the latencies).
Before, we queried "TTI->getInstructionLatency()" for the instruction latency
and the extra prediction cost. Now, we query the TargetSchedule abstraction for
the instruction latency and TargetInstrInfo for the extra predictation cost. The
TargetSchedule abstraction will internally call "TTI->getInstructionLatency" if
an itinerary exists, otherwise it will use the new schedule model.
ATTENTION: Out of tree targets!
(I will also send out an email later to LLVMDev)
This means, if your target implements
unsigned getInstrLatency(const InstrItineraryData *ItinData,
const MachineInstr *MI,
unsigned *PredCost);
and returns a value for "PredCost", you now also need to implement
unsigned getPredictationCost(const MachineInstr *MI);
(if your target uses the IfConversion.cpp pass)
radar://15077010
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191671 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Replace the ill-defined MinLatency and ILPWindow properties with
with straightforward buffer sizes:
MCSchedMode::MicroOpBufferSize
MCProcResourceDesc::BufferSize
These can be used to more precisely model instruction execution if desired.
Disabled some misched tests temporarily. They'll be reenabled in a few commits.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@184032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Target library is not allowed to depend on the large CodeGen
library, but the TRI and TII classes provide abstract interfaces that
require both caller and callee to link to CodeGen.
The implementation files for these classes provide default
implementations of some of the hooks. These methods may need to
reference CodeGen, so they belong in that library.
We already have a number of methods implemented in the
TargetInstrInfoImpl sub-class because of that. I will merge that class
into the parent next.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168758 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
