(reverted in r235533)
Original commit message:
"Calls to llvm::Value::mutateType are becoming extra-sensitive now that
instructions have extra type information that will not be derived from
operands or result type (alloca, gep, load, call/invoke, etc... ). The
special-handling for mutateType will get more complicated as this work
continues - it might be worth making mutateType virtual & pushing the
complexity down into the classes that need special handling. But with
only two significant uses of mutateType (vectorization and linking) this
seems OK for now.
Totally open to ideas/suggestions/improvements, of course.
With this, and a bunch of exceptions, we can roundtrip an indirect call
site through bitcode and IR. (a direct call site is actually trickier...
I haven't figured out how to deal with the IR deserializer's lazy
construction of Function/GlobalVariable decl's based on the type of the
entity which means looking through the "pointer to T" type referring to
the global)"
The remapping done in ValueMapper for LTO was insufficient as the types
weren't correctly mapped (though I was using the post-mapped operands,
some of those operands might not have been mapped yet so the type
wouldn't be post-mapped yet). Instead use the pre-mapped type and
explicitly map all the types.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235651 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r235458.
It looks like this might be breaking something LTO-ish. Looking into it
& will recommit with a fix/test case/etc once I've got more to go on.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235533 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Calls to llvm::Value::mutateType are becoming extra-sensitive now that
instructions have extra type information that will not be derived from
operands or result type (alloca, gep, load, call/invoke, etc... ). The
special-handling for mutateType will get more complicated as this work
continues - it might be worth making mutateType virtual & pushing the
complexity down into the classes that need special handling. But with
only two significant uses of mutateType (vectorization and linking) this
seems OK for now.
Totally open to ideas/suggestions/improvements, of course.
With this, and a bunch of exceptions, we can roundtrip an indirect call
site through bitcode and IR. (a direct call site is actually trickier...
I haven't figured out how to deal with the IR deserializer's lazy
construction of Function/GlobalVariable decl's based on the type of the
entity which means looking through the "pointer to T" type referring to
the global)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@235458 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CallSite roughly behaves as a common base CallInst and InvokeInst. Bring
the behavior closer to that model by making upcasts explicit. Downcasts
remain implicit and work as before.
Following dyn_cast as a mental model checking whether a Value *V isa
CallSite now looks like this:
if (auto CS = CallSite(V)) // think dyn_cast
instead of:
if (CallSite CS = V)
This is an extra token but I think it is slightly clearer. Making the
ctor explicit has the advantage of not accidentally creating nullptr
CallSites, e.g. when you pass a Value * to a function taking a CallSite
argument.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@234601 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Generate tables in the .xdata section representing what actions to take
when an exception is thrown. This currently fills in state for
cleanups, catch handlers are still unfinished.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@233636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This attribute indicates that the parameter or return pointer is
dereferenceable. Practically speaking, loads from such a pointer within the
associated byte range are safe to speculatively execute. Such pointer
parameters are common in source languages (C++ references, for example).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213385 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The number of tail call to loop conversions remains the same (1618 by my count).
The new algorithm does a local scan over the use-def chains to identify local "alloca-derived" values, as well as points where the alloca could escape. Then, a visit over the CFG marks blocks as being before or after the allocas have escaped, and annotates the calls accordingly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@208017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is similar to the 'tail' marker, except that it guarantees that
tail call optimization will occur. It also comes with convervative IR
verification rules that ensure that tail call optimization is possible.
Reviewers: nicholas
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3240
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@207143 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
itself and teach it to convert between the non-const and const variants.
De-templatetize its usage in APIs to just use the const variant which
always works for those use cases. Also, rename its implementation to
reflect that it is an iterator over *users* not over *uses*.
This is a step toward providing both iterator and range support for
walking the *uses* distinct from the *users*. In a subsequent patch this
will get renamed to make it clear that this is an adaptor over the
fundamental use iterator.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202923 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
