MSVC always places the 'this' parameter for a method first. The
implicit 'sret' pointer for methods always comes second. We already
implement this for __thiscall by putting sret parameters on the stack,
but __cdecl methods require putting both parameters on the stack in
opposite order.
Using a special calling convention allows frontends to keep the sret
parameter first, which avoids breaking lots of assumptions in LLVM and
Clang.
Fixes PR15768 with the corresponding change in Clang.
Reviewers: ributzka, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2663
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200561 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of complex instruction operands (e.g. address modes).
Currently, if a Pat pattern creates an instruction that has a complex
operand (i.e. one that consists of multiple sub-operands at the MI
level), this operand must match a ComplexPattern DAG pattern with the
correct number of output operands.
This commit extends TableGen to alternatively allow match a complex
operands against multiple separate operands at the DAG level.
This allows using Pat patterns to match pre-increment nodes like
pre_store (which must have separate operands at the DAG level) onto
an instruction pattern that uses a multi-operand memory operand,
like the following example on PowerPC (will be committed as a
follow-on patch):
def STWU : DForm_1<37, (outs ptr_rc:$ea_res), (ins GPRC:$rS, memri:$dst),
"stwu $rS, $dst", LdStStoreUpd, []>,
RegConstraint<"$dst.reg = $ea_res">, NoEncode<"$ea_res">;
def : Pat<(pre_store GPRC:$rS, ptr_rc:$ptrreg, iaddroff:$ptroff),
(STWU GPRC:$rS, iaddroff:$ptroff, ptr_rc:$ptrreg)>;
Here, the pair of "ptroff" and "ptrreg" operands is matched onto the
complex operand "dst" of class "memri" in the "STWU" instruction.
Approved by Jakob Stoklund Olesen.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177428 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Before we learned about :doc:, we used :ref: and put a dummy link at the
top of each page. Don't do that anymore.
This fixes PR14891 as a special case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172162 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixes PR14380.
The prose was referring to a "bold" part of the code example, where the
boldness was lost in the transition from HTML. Unlike HTML, where one
can easily have a <b> inside a <pre>, reStructuredText is generally
unable to represent such nested markup.
Hack around it with the :emphasise-lines: option to the code-block
directive to single out the regions instead. Thankfully the regions are
close-enough to being full lines for this to work.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@168329 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
