Clang -gsplit-dwarf self-host -O0, binary increases by 0.0005%, -O2,
binary increases by 25%.
A large binary inside Google, split-dwarf, -O0, and other internal flags
(GDB index, etc) increases by 1.8%, optimized build is 35%.
The size impact may be somewhat greater in .o files (I haven't measured
that much - since the linked executable -O0 numbers seemed low enough)
due to relocations. These relocations could be removed if we taught the
llvm-symbolizer to handle indexed addressing in the .o file (GDB can't
cope with this just yet, but GDB won't be reading this info anyway).
Also debug_ranges could be shared between .o and .dwo, though ideally
debug_ranges would get a schema that could used index(+offset)
addressing, and move to the .dwo file, then we'd be back to sharing
addresses in the address pool again.
But for now, these sizes seem small enough to go ahead with this.
Verified that no other DW_TAGs are produced into the .o file other than
subprograms and inlined_subroutines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This generalizes the range handling for ranges in both the skeleton and
full unit, laying the foundation for the addition of more ranges (rather
than just the CU's special case) in the skeleton CU with fission+gmlt.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221202 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
So that it may be shared between skeleton/full compile unit, for CU
ranges and other ranges to be added for fission+gmlt.
(at some point we might want some kind of object shared between the
skeleton and full compile units for all those things we only want one of
in that scope, rather than having the full unit always look through to
the skeleton... - alternatively, we might be able to have the skeleton
pointer (or another, separate pointer) point to the skeleton or to the
unit itself in non-fission, so we don't have to special case its
absence)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is one of a few steps to generalize range handling to include the
CU range (thus the CU's range list will be moved into the range list
list, losing track of the base address in the process), which means
generalizing ranges from both the skeleton and full unit under fission.
And... then I can used that generalized support for ranges in
fission+gmlt where there'll be a bunch more ranges in the skeleton.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221182 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently we only need to emit skeleton strings into the CU header and
we do this by explicitly calling "addLocalString". With gmlt-in-fission,
we'll be emitting a bunch of other strings from other codepaths where
it's not statically known that these strings will be local or not.
Introduce a virtual function to indicate whether this unit is a DWO unit
or not (I'm not sure if we have a good term for this, the
opposite/alternative to 'skeleton' unit) and use that to generalize the
string emission logic so that strings can be correctly emitted in both
the skeleton and dwo unit when in split dwarf mode.
And to demonstrate that this works, switch the existing special callers
of addLocalString in the skeleton builder to addString - and they still
work. Yay.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221094 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This would help catch cases where we might otherwise try to reference a
dwo CU label, which would be weird - because without relocations in the
dwo file it's not generally meaningful to talk about the CU offsets
there (or, if it is, we can do so in absolute terms without using a
relocation to compute it).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221078 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows the CU label to be emitted only for compile units, as
they're the only ones that need it (so they can be referenced from
pubnames)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was a compile-unit specific label (unused in type units) and seems
unnecessary anyway when we can more easily directly compute the size of
the compile unit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221067 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Type units no longer have skeletons and it's misleading to be able to
query for a type unit's skeleton (it might incorrectly lead one to
conclude that if a unit doesn't have a skeleton it's not in a .dwo
file... ).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@221055 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
So that it has access to getOrCreateGlobalVariableDIE. If we ever support
decsribing using directive in C++ classes (thus requiring support in type
units), it will certainly use another mechanism anyway.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5975
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@220594 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This introduces access to the AbstractSPDies map from DwarfDebug so
DwarfCompileUnit can access it. Eventually this'll sink down to
DwarfFile, but it'll still be generically accessible - not much
encapsulation to provide it. (constructInlinedScopeDIE could stay
further up, in DwarfFile to avoid exposing this - but I don't think
that's particularly better)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219411 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(& add a few accessors/make a couple of things public for this - it's a
bit of a toss-up, but I think I prefer it this way, keeping some more of
the meaty code down in DwarfCompileUnit - if only to make for smaller
implementation files, etc)
I think we could simplify range handling a bit if we removed the range
lists from each unit and just put a single range list on DwarfDebug,
similar to address pooling.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219370 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
One of many steps to generalize subprogram emission to both the DWO and
non-DWO sections (to emit -gmlt-like data under fission). Once the
functions are pushed down into DwarfCompileUnit some of the data
structures will be pushed at least into DwarfFile so that they can be
unique per-file, allowing emission to both files independently.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219345 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This requires exposing some of the current function state from
DwarfDebug. I hope there's not too much of that to expose as I go
through all the functions, but it still seems nicer to expose singular
data down to multiple consumers, than have consumers expose raw mapping
data structures up to DwarfDebug for building subprograms.
Part of a series of refactoring to allow subprograms in both the
skeleton and dwo CUs under Fission.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219060 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
One of many things to sink down into DwarfCompileUnit to allow handling
of subprograms in both the skeleton and dwo CU under Fission.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In preparation for sinking all the subprogram emission code down from
DwarfDebug into DwarfCompileUnit, this will avoid bloating
DwarfUnit.h/cpp greatly and make concerns a bit more clear/isolated.
(sinking this handling down is part of the work to handle emitting
minimal subprograms for -gmlt-like data into the skeleton CU under
fission)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219057 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Header/cpp file rename to follow immediately - just splitting out the
commits for ease of review/reading to demonstrate that the renaming
changes are entirely mechanical.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196139 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r195698 moved the type unit checking up into getOrCreateTypeDIE so
remove the redundant check and fold the functions back together again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195700 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It might be possible to eventually use one data structure, but I haven't
looked at the exact criteria used for accelerator tables and pubtypes to
see if there's good reason for the differences between the two or not.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195696 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
