Now we collect all of the call sites we are interested in inlining, then inline
them. This entirely avoids issues with trying to inline a call site we got by
inlining another call site. This also eliminates iterator invalidation issues.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12770 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This also implements some new features for the indvars pass, including
linear function test replacement, exit value substitution, and it works with
a much more general class of induction variables and loops.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12620 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
#1 is to unconditionally strip constantpointerrefs out of
instruction operands where they are absolutely pointless and inhibit
optimization. GRRR!
#2 is to implement InstCombine/getelementptr_const.ll
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12519 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With this fix we now successfully extract all 149 loops from 256.bzip2 without
crashing or miscompiling the program!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. Names were not put on the new arguments created (ok, this just helps sanity :)
2. Fix outgoing pointer values
3. Do not insert stores for values that had not been computed
4. Fix some wierd problems with the outset calculation
This fixes CodeExtractor/2004-03-14-DominanceProblem.ll, making the extractor
work on at least one simple case!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12484 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
as it is making effectively arbitrary modifications to the CFG and we don't
have a domset/domfrontier implementations that can handle the dynamic updates.
Instead of having a bunch of code that doesn't actually work in practice,
just demote any potentially tricky values to the stack (causing the problem
to go away entirely). Later invocations of mem2reg will rebuild SSA for us.
This fixes all of the major performance regressions with tail duplication
from LLVM 1.1. For example, this loop:
---
int popcount(int x) {
int result = 0;
while (x != 0) {
result = result + (x & 0x1);
x = x >> 1;
}
return result;
}
---
Used to be compiled into:
int %popcount(int %X) {
entry:
br label %loopentry
loopentry: ; preds = %entry, %no_exit
%x.0 = phi int [ %X, %entry ], [ %tmp.9, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=3]
%result.1.0 = phi int [ 0, %entry ], [ %tmp.6, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=2]
%tmp.1 = seteq int %x.0, 0 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
br bool %tmp.1, label %loopexit, label %no_exit
no_exit: ; preds = %loopentry
%tmp.4 = and int %x.0, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.6 = add int %tmp.4, %result.1.0 ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.9 = shr int %x.0, ubyte 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
br label %loopentry
loopexit: ; preds = %loopentry
ret int %result.1.0
}
And is now compiled into:
int %popcount(int %X) {
entry:
br label %no_exit
no_exit: ; preds = %entry, %no_exit
%x.0.0 = phi int [ %X, %entry ], [ %tmp.9, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=2]
%result.1.0.0 = phi int [ 0, %entry ], [ %tmp.6, %no_exit ] ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.4 = and int %x.0.0, 1 ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.6 = add int %tmp.4, %result.1.0.0 ; <int> [#uses=2]
%tmp.9 = shr int %x.0.0, ubyte 1 ; <int> [#uses=2]
%tmp.1 = seteq int %tmp.9, 0 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
br bool %tmp.1, label %loopexit, label %no_exit
loopexit: ; preds = %no_exit
ret int %tmp.6
}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12457 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
time from 615s to 1.49s on a large testcase that has a gigantic switch statement
that all of the blocks in the function go to (an intepreter).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12442 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Simplify the input/output finder. All elements of a basic block are
instructions. Any used arguments are also inputs. An instruction can only
be used by another instruction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12405 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
extracted, and a function that contained a single top-level loop never had
the loop extracted, regardless of how much non-loop code there was.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12403 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Don't insert a branch to the switch instruction after the call, just
make it a single block.
* Insert the new alloca instructions in the entry block of the original
function instead of having them execute dynamically
* Don't make the default edge of the switch instruction go back to the switch.
The loop extractor shouldn't create new loops!
* Give meaningful names to the alloca slots and the reload instructions
* Some minor code simplifications
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This also implements a two minor improvements:
* Don't insert live-out stores IN the region, insert them on the code path
that exits the region
* If the region is exited to the same block from multiple paths, share the
switch statement entry, live-out store code, and the basic block.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12401 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a member of the class. While we're at it, turn the collection into a set
instead of a vector to improve efficiency and make queries simpler.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12400 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8