AKA: Recompile *ALL* the source code!
This one went much better. No manual edits here. I spot-checked for
silliness and grep-checked for really broken edits and everything seemed
good. It all still compiles. Yell if you see something that looks goofy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169133 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a patch by Guoping Long!
As part of utilizing LLVM Dominator computation in Clang, made two changes to LLVM dominators tree implementation:
- (1) Change the recalculate() template function to only rely on GraphTraits.
- (2) Add a size() method to GraphTraits template class to query the number of nodes in the graph.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145837 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
computation, the Ancestor field is always set to the Parent, so we can remove
the explicit link entirely and merge the Parent and Ancestor fields. Instead of
checking for whether an ancestor exists for a node or not, we simply check
whether the node has already been processed. This is simpler if Compress is
inlined into Eval, so I did that as well.
This is about a 3% speedup running -domtree on test-suite + SPEC2000 & SPEC2006,
but it also opens up some opportunities for further improvement.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124061 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
compile, and everyone's tests have shown it to be slower in practice, even for
quite large graphs.
I also hope to do an optimization that is only correct with the simpler data
structure, which would break this even further.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122684 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
naively implemented, the Lengauer-Tarjan algorithm requires a separate bucket
for each vertex. However, this is unnecessary, because each vertex is only
placed into a single bucket (that of its semidominator), and each vertex's
bucket is processed before it is added to any bucket itself.
Instead of using a bucket per vertex, we use a single array Buckets that has two
purposes. Before the vertex V with DFS number i is processed, Buckets[i] stores
the index of the first element in V's bucket. After V's bucket is processed,
Buckets[i] stores the index of the next element in the bucket to which V now
belongs, if any.
Reading from the buckets can also be optimized. Instead of processing the bucket
of V's parent at the end of processing V, we process the bucket of V itself at
the beginning of processing V. This means that the case of the root vertex can
be simplified somewhat. It also means that we don't need to look up the DFS
number of the semidominator of every node in the bucket we are processing,
since we know it is the current index being processed.
This is a 6.5% speedup running -domtree on test-suite + SPEC2000/2006, with
larger speedups of around 12% on the larger benchmarks like GCC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122680 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(by caching the result we save a potentially expensive dereference)
also use typedefs to shorten type declarations
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@107883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Nodes that had children outside of the post dominator tree (infinite loops)
where removed from the post dominator tree. This seems to be wrong. Leave them
in the tree.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@93633 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove a FIXME and unify code that was necessary to work around broken
updateDFSNumbers(). Before updateDFSNumbers() did not work correctly for post
dominators.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92968 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in CodeExtractor and LoopSimplify unnecessary.
Hartmut, could you confirm that this fixes the issues you were seeing?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@43115 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
