This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash. The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).
Original commit message follows.
--
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString. Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.
Part of PR17891.
Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR. If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218914 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A bunch of test cases needed to be cleaned up for this, many my fault -
when implementid imported modules I updated test cases by simply
duplicating the prior metadata field - which wasn't always the empty
metadata entry.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@200731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We are going to drop debug info without a version number or with a different
version number, to make sure we don't crash when we see bitcode files with
different debug info metadata format.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@195504 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In the case (shown in the attached test) where a member function
definition was emitted into debug info the following could occur:
1) build the debug info for the member function definition
2) in (1), build the debug info for the member function declaration
3) construct and add the member function declaration DIE
4) add it to its context
5) build its context (the type it is a member of)
6) construct the members and add them to the type
7) except don't add member functions because "getOrCreateSubprogram"
adds the function to its parent anyway
8) except we're only partway through building this subprogram
declaration so it hasn't been added yet - but we returned the partially
constructed DIE (since it's already in the MDNode->DIE mapping to avoid
infinitely recursing trying to create the member function DIE)
9) once the type is constructed, add the member function to it
10) now the members are out of order (the member function being defined
is listed as the last member, even though it was declared as the first)
To avoid this, construct the context of the subprogram DIE before we
query to see if it exists. That way we never end up creating it before
creating its context and ending up in this situation.
Alternatively, the type construction that visits/builds all the members
could call something like getOrCreateSubprogram, but that doesn't ever
do the "add to context" step. Then the type building code would always
be responsible for adding members (and the subprogram "addToContextDIE"
would no-op because the context building would have added the subprogram
declaration to the type/context DIE already).
(the test cases updated were overly-sensitive to offsets or abbreviation
numbers. We don't have a nice way to make these tests more robust as yet
- multiline FileCheck matches would be required)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191939 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
