Since we only ever instantiate with a type that is a MachOType instantiation,
we don't need to pass template argument.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179178 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The target hooks are getting out of hand. What does it mean to run
before or after regalloc anyway? Allowing either Pass* or AnalysisID
pass identification should make it much easier for targets to use the
substitutePass and insertPass APIs, and create less need for badly
named target hooks.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit adds the infrastructure for performing bottom-up SLP vectorization (and other optimizations) on parallel computations.
The infrastructure has three potential users:
1. The loop vectorizer needs to be able to vectorize AOS data structures such as (sum += A[i] + A[i+1]).
2. The BB-vectorizer needs this infrastructure for bottom-up SLP vectorization, because bottom-up vectorization is faster to compute.
3. A loop-roller needs to be able to analyze consecutive chains and roll them into a loop, in order to reduce code size. A loop roller does not need to create vector instructions, and this infrastructure separates the chain analysis from the vectorization.
This patch also includes a simple (100 LOC) bottom up SLP vectorizer that uses the infrastructure, and can vectorize this code:
void SAXPY(int *x, int *y, int a, int i) {
x[i] = a * x[i] + y[i];
x[i+1] = a * x[i+1] + y[i+1];
x[i+2] = a * x[i+2] + y[i+2];
x[i+3] = a * x[i+3] + y[i+3];
}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179117 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
parse an identifier. Otherwise, parseExpression may parse multiple tokens,
which makes it impossible to properly compute an immediate displacement.
An example of such a case is the source operand (i.e., [Symbol + ImmDisp]) in
the below example:
__asm mov eax, [Symbol + ImmDisp]
The existing test cases exercise this patch.
rdar://13611297
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179115 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
rather than deriving the StringRef from the Start and End SMLocs.
Using the Start and End SMLocs works fine for operands such as [Symbol], but
not for operands such as [Symbol + ImmDisp]. All existing test cases that
reference a variable exercise this patch.
rdar://13602265
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179109 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some parts of PointerIntPair assumed that the IntType of the pair was implicitly
convertible to intptr_t, which is not the case for enum class values. Add a
static_cast<intptr_t> to make these conversions explicit and allow
PointerIntPair to be used with an enum class IntType. While we're here, rename
some of the argument values so we don't have variables named "Int" floating
around.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code in getTypeConversion attempts to promote the element vector type
before it trys to split or widen the vector.
After it failed finding a legal vector type by promoting it would continue using
the promoted vector element type. Thereby missing legal splitted vector types.
For example the type v32i32 that has a legal split of 4 x v3i32 on x86/sse2
would be transformed to: v32i256 and from there on successively split to:
v16i256, v8i256, v1i256 and then finally ends up as an i64 type.
By resetting the vector element type to the original vector element type that
existed before the promotion the code will attempt to split the vector type to
smaller vector widths of the same type.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178999 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These were the last missing forwarding functions. Also consistently use
the forwarding functions instead of using MachOObj directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178992 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoadCommandInfo was needed to keep a command and its offset in the file. Now
that we always have a pointer to the command, we don't need the offset.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178991 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This comment documents the current behavior of the ARM implementation of this
callback, and also the soon-to-be-committed PPC version.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178959 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This fixes PEI as previously described, but correctly handles the case where
the instruction defining the virtual register to be scavenged is the first in
the block. Arnold provided me with a bugpoint-reduced test case, but even that
seems too large to use as a regression test. If I'm successful in cleaning it
up then I'll commit that as well.
Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178919 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
During LTO, the target options on functions within the same Module may
change. This would necessitate resetting some of the back-end. Do this for X86,
because it's a Friday afternoon.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverting because this breaks one of the LTO builders. Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178916 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InMemoryStruct is extremely dangerous as it returns data from an internal
buffer when the endiannes doesn't match. This should fix the tests on big
endian hosts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178875 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178845 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
