This reverts commit r179840 with a fix to test/DebugInfo/two-cus-from-same-file.ll
I'm not sure why that test only failed on ARM & MIPS and not X86 Linux, even
though the debug info was clearly invalid on all of them, but this ought to fix
it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179996 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Adding another CU-wide list, in this case of imported_modules (since they
should be relatively rare, it seemed better to add a list where each element
had a "context" value, rather than add a (usually empty) list to every scope).
This takes care of DW_TAG_imported_module, but to fully address PR14606 we'll
need to expand this to cover DW_TAG_imported_declaration too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@179836 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit 342d92c7a0.
Turns out we're going with a different schema design to represent
DW_TAG_imported_modules so we won't need this extra field.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@178099 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes DIType's first non-tag parameter the same as DIFile's, allowing them
to both share the common implementation of getFilename/getDirectory in DIScope.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177467 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is another step along the way to making all DIScopes have a common prefix
which can be added to in a general manner to support using directives
(DW_TAG_imported_module).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the first step to making all DIScopes have a common metadata prefix (so
that things (using directives, for example) that can appear in any scope can be
added to that common prefix). DIFile is itself a DIScope so the common prefix
of all DIScopes cannot be a DIFile - instead it's the raw filename/directory
name pair.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@177239 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the next step towards making the metadata for DIScopes have a common
prefix rather than having to delegate based on their tag type.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176913 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This could be 'null' or the empty string, DIDescriptor::getStringField
coalesces the two cases anyway so it's just a matter of legible/efficient
representation.
The change in behavior of the DICompileUnit::get* functions could be
subsumed by the full verification check - but ideally that should just be an
assertion if we could front-load the actual debug info metadata failure paths.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176907 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The main lists of debug info metadata attached to the compile_unit had an extra
layer of metadata nodes they went through for no apparent reason. This patch
removes that (& still passes just as much of the GDB 7.5 test suite). If anyone
can show evidence as to why these extra metadata nodes are there I'm open to
reverting this patch & documenting why they're there.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@174266 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
types and a FIXME for what we should be doing. Should solve the
immediacy of PR12069 where our debug info is crashing another
tool.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
