handles with a pointer to the containing map. When a map is copied, these
pointers need to be corrected to point to the new map. If not, then consider
the case of a map M1 which maps a value V to something. Create a copy M2 of
M1. At this point there are two value handles on V, one representing V as a
key in M1, the other representing V as a key in M2. But both value handles
point to M1 as the containing map. Now delete V. The value handles remove
themselves from their containing map (which destroys them), but only the first
value handle is successful: the second one cannot remove itself from M1 as
(once the first one has removed itself) there is nothing there to remove; it
is therefore not destroyed. This causes an assertion failure "All references
to V were not removed?".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@109851 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
even when keys get RAUWed and deleted during its lifetime. By default the keys
act like WeakVHs, but users can pass a third template parameter to configure
how updates work and whether to do anything beyond updating the map on each
action.
It's also possible to automatically acquire a lock around ValueMap updates
triggered by RAUWs and deletes, to support the ExecutionEngine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@84890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
