a + {b,+,stride} into {a+b,+,stride} (because a is LIV),
then the resultant AddRec is NUW/NSW if the client says it
is.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123133 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
void f(int* begin, int* end) { std::fill(begin, end, 0); }
which turns into a != exit expression where one pointer is
strided and (thanks to step #1) known to not overflow, and
the other is loop invariant.
The observation here is that, though the IV is strided by
4 in this case, that the IV *has* to become equal to the
end value. It cannot "miss" the end value by stepping over
it, because if it did, the strided IV expression would
eventually wrap around.
Handle this by turning A != B into "A-B != 0" where the A-B
part is known to be NUW.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123131 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ret i64 ptrtoint (i8* getelementptr ([1000 x i8]* @X, i64 1, i64 sub (i64 0, i64 ptrtoint ([1000 x i8]* @X to i64))) to i64)
to "ret i64 1000". This allows us to correctly compute the trip count
on a loop in PR8883, which occurs with std::fill on a char array. This
allows us to transform it into a memset with a constant size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122950 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
hasBlockValue() that was causing iterator invalidations. Many thanks to Dimitry Andric for
tracking down those invalidations!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122906 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a pointer value has potentially become escaping. Implementations can choose to either fall back to
conservative responses for that value, or may recompute their analysis to accomodate the change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
update a callGraph when performing the common operation of splicing the body to
a new function and updating all callers (such as via RAUW).
No users yet, though this is intended for DeadArgumentElimination as part of
PR8887.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
numbering, in which it considers (for example) "%a = add i32 %x, %y" and
"%b = add i32 %x, %y" to be equal because the operands are equal and the
result of the instructions only depends on the values of the operands.
This has almost no effect (it removes 4 instructions from gcc-as-one-file),
and perhaps slows down compilation: I measured a 0.4% slowdown on the large
gcc-as-one-file testcase, but it wasn't statistically significant.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the original instruction, half the cases were missed (making it not
wrong but suboptimal). Also correct a typo (A <-> B) in the second
chunk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
not assume this (for example in case more transforms get added below
it). Suggested by Frits van Bommel.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122332 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
quite often, but don't make much difference in practice presumably because
instcombine also knows them and more.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122328 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a couple of existing transforms. This fires surprisingly often, for
example when compiling gcc "(X+(-1))+1->X" fires quite a lot as well
as various "and" simplifications (usually with a phi node operand).
Most of the time this doesn't make a real difference since the same
thing would have been done elsewhere anyway, eg: by instcombine, but
there are a few places where this results in simplifications that we
were not doing before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122326 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(they had just been forgotten before). Adding Xor causes "main" in the
existing testcase 2010-11-01-lshr-mask.ll to be hugely more simplified.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122245 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While LLVM's main design is that analysis code shouldn't
go out of its way to understand code which hasn't been
InstCombined, analysis utility routines like this can
find themselves being called in the middle of transform
passes when instcombine hasn't had a chance to run.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121886 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* mergeIn now uses constant folding for constants that are provably not-equal.
* sink some sanity checks from the get*() methods into the mark*() methods, to ensure that we never have a constant/notconstant ConstantInt
* some textual cleanups, whitespace changes, removing "else" after return, that sort of thing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121877 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
it to be replaced by undef rather than not replaced at all, the idea being that
this may reduce the amount of work done by whoever called InstructionSimplify.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@121860 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
