just ask ScalarEvolution for it on demand. This helps IVUsers be more robust
in the case of expressions changing underneath it. This fixes PR6862.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101819 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Probably the best way to know that all getOperand() calls have been handled
is to replace that API instead of updating.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101579 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
callee is expected to be expanded to something else by codegen, so that
normal infinitely recursive calls are still transformed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with a fix for self-hosting
rotate CallInst operands, i.e. move callee to the back
of the operand array
the motivation for this patch are laid out in my mail to llvm-commits:
more efficient access to operands and callee, faster callgraph-construction,
smaller compiler binary
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101465 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
with a fix
rotate CallInst operands, i.e. move callee to the back
of the operand array
the motivation for this patch are laid out in my mail to llvm-commits:
more efficient access to operands and callee, faster callgraph-construction,
smaller compiler binary
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101397 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of the operand array
the motivation for this patch are laid out in my mail to llvm-commits:
more efficient access to operands and callee, faster callgraph-construction,
smaller compiler binary
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
numerator is an induction variable. For example, with code like this:
for (i=0;i<n;++i)
x[i%n] = 0;
IndVarSimplify will now recognize that i is always less than n inside
the loop, and eliminate the remainder.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101113 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
expression is a UDiv and it doesn't appear that the UDiv came from
the user's source.
ScalarEvolution has recently figured out how to compute a tripcount
expression for the inner loop in
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve.c, using a udiv. Emitting a
udiv instruction dramatically slows down the enclosing loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101068 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a ScalarEvolution bug with overflow handling is fixed, the normal analysis
code will automatically decline to operate on the icmp instructions which
are responsible for the loop exit.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instead of deleting just the user. This makes it more consistent with
other code in IndVarSimplify, and theoretically can eliminate more users
earlier.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101027 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the loop exit test. This usually doesn't come up for a variety of
reasons, but it isn't impossible, so make IndVarSimplify handle it
conservatively.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101008 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
variables. For example, with code like this:
for (i=0;i<n;++i)
if (i<n)
x[i] = 0;
IndVarSimplify will now recognize that i is always less than n inside
the loop, and eliminate the if.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@101000 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into adjacent loops. Also, ensure that the insert position is
dominated by the loop latch of any loop in the post-inc set which
has a latch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100906 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
forced constant is changed to a constant, we would end
up adding the instruction to the wrong worklist,
preventing it from being properly revisited. This fixes
rdar://7832370
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100837 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
explicitly split into stride-and-offset pairs. Also, add the
ability to track multiple post-increment loops on the same expression.
This refines the concept of "normalizing" SCEV expressions used for
to post-increment uses, and introduces a dedicated utility routine for
normalizing and denormalizing expressions.
This fixes the expansion of expressions which are post-increment users
of more than one loop at a time. More broadly, this takes LSR another
step closer to being able to reason about more than one loop at a time.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100699 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
undefs in branches/switches, we have two cases: a branch on a literal
undef or a branch on a symbolic value which is undef. If we have a
literal undef, the code was correct: forcing it to a constant is the
right thing to do.
If we have a branch on a symbolic value that is undef, we should force
the symbolic value to a constant, which then makes the successor block
live. Forcing the condition of the branch to being a constant isn't
safe if later paths become live and the value becomes overdefined. This
is the case that 'forcedconstant' is designed to handle, so just use it.
This fixes rdar://7765019 but there is no good testcase for this, the
one I have is too insane to be useful in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100478 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Added support for address spaces and added a isVolatile field to memcpy, memmove, and memset,
e.g., llvm.memcpy.i32(i8*, i8*, i32, i32) -> llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8*, i8*, i32, i32, i1)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100304 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
exits the loop. With this information we can guarantee
the iteration count of the loop is bounded by the
compare. I think this xforms is finally safe now.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
checker. Amusingly, we already had tests that we should
have rejects because they would be miscompiled in the
testsuite.
The remaining issue with this is that we don't check that
the branch causes us to exit the loop if it fails, so we
don't actually know if we remain in bounds.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100284 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to a signed vs unsigned value depending on the sign of the
constant fp means that we can't distinguish between a
truly negative number and a positive number so large the
32nd bit is set. So, do don't this!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the required validity checks in the first place, and supporting
a condition large enough to require the 32'nd bit isn't worth it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100280 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
