Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238192 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The buildbots are still not satisfied.
MIPS and ARM are failing (even though at least MIPS was expected to pass).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237245 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237234 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The loop which emits AssemblerPredicate conditions also links them together by emitting a '&&'.
If the 1st predicate is not an AssemblerPredicate, while the 2nd one is, nothing gets emitted for the 1st one, but we still emit the '&&' because of the 2nd predicate.
This generated code looks like "( && Cond2)" and is invalid.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8294
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@234312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
