When calling lock() after all passes are registered, the PassRegistry doesn't need a mutex anymore to look up passes.
This speeds up multithreaded llvm execution by ~5% (tested with 4 threads).
In an asserts build of llvm this has an even bigger impact.
Note that it's not required to use the lock function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231276 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reverted in r231254 due to a self-hosting crash of Clang (see Clang
PR22793). Workaround the crash by using {} instead of = default to
define a dtor.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231274 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231270 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
In PNaCl, most atomic instructions have their own @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function, each one, with a few exceptions, represents a consistent behaviour across all NaCl-supported targets. Unfortunately, the atomic RMW operations nand, [u]min, and [u]max aren't directly represented by any such @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function. This patch refines shouldExpandAtomicRMWInIR in TargetLowering so that a future `Le32TargetLowering` class can selectively inform the caller how the target desires the atomic RMW instruction to be expanded (ie via load-linked/store-conditional for ARM/AArch64, via cmpxchg for X86/others?, or not at all for Mips) if at all.
This does not represent a behavioural change and as such no tests were added.
Patch by: Richard Diamond.
Reviewers: jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, aemerson, t.p.northover, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7713
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231250 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Asserting that the source and destination iterators are from the same
region is unnecessary - there's no reason to disallow reassignment from
any regions, so long as they aren't compared.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231224 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Since OptionValue (& its base classes) have user-declared dtors, use of
the implicit copy ctor/assignment operator is deprecated in C++11.
Provide them explicitly (defaulted) to avoid depending on this
deprecated feature.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These objects are never polymorphically owned, so there's no need for
virtual dtors - just make the dtor protected in the base classes, and
make the derived classes final.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231217 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will now display enum definitions both at the global
scope as well as nested inside of classes. Additionally,
it will no longer display enums at the global scope if the
enum is nested. Instead, it will omit the definition of
the enum globally and instead emit it in the corresponding
class definition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231215 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(They are called emitDwarfDIE and emitDwarfAbbrevs in their new home)
llvm-dsymutil wants to reuse that code, but it doesn't have a DwarfUnit or
a DwarfDebug object to call those. It has access to an AsmPrinter though.
Having emitDIE in the AsmPrinter also removes the DwarfFile dependency
on DwarfDebug, and thus the patch drops that field.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8024
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231210 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GCC 4.7's libstdc++ doesn't have std::map::emplace, but it does have
std::unordered_map::emplace, and the use case here doesn't appear to
need ordering. The container has been changed in a separate/precursor
patch, and now this patch should hopefully build cleanly even with
GCC 4.7.
& then I realized the order of the container did matter, so extra
handling of ordering was added in r231189.
Original commit message:
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231192 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The order of this container was needed at one point - so, at that point
create a temporary array of pointers, sort those, then iterate them.
This keeps lookup efficient (& the lesser issue, of allowing the use of
emplace... ), object identity preserved, and ordered iteration in the
one place that requires it.
While this has no functional change, I realize it does mean allocating
an extra data structure and performing a sort - so if this looks suspect
to anyone regarding perf characteristics, I'm all ears.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231189 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Apparently something does care about ordering of LiveIntervals... so
revert all that stuff (r231175, r231176, r231177) & take some time to
re-evaluate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231184 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The intrinsic is no longer generated by the front-end. Remove the intrinsic and
auto-upgrade it to a vector shuffle.
Reviewed by Nadav
This is related to rdar://problem/18742778.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231182 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GCC 4.7's libstdc++ doesn't have std::map::emplace, but it does have
std::unordered_map::emplace, and the use case here doesn't appear to
need ordering. The container has been changed in a separate/precursor
patch, and now this patch should hopefully build cleanly even with
GCC 4.7.
Original commit message:
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231176 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This use case doesn't appear to benefit from ordering, and
std::unordered_map has the advantage that it supports emplace (the
LiveInterval values really shouldn't be copyable or movable & they won't
be in a near-future patch).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231175 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This makes it more obvious that the enum definition and the
"StandardName" array is in sync. Mechanically refactored w/ a
python script.
Test Plan: still compiles
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7845
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This does not conceptually belongs here. Instead provide a shortcut
getModule() that provides access to the DataLayout.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8027
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231147 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I removed the copy ctor, thinking that'd be the end of it - these
iterators should be perfectly assignable even from disjoint ranges (as
any iterator would be) - exkcept that the member was const.
Unconstify it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231146 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There's no reason to disallow assigning an iterator from one range to an
iterator that previously iterated over a disjoint range. This then
follows the Rule of Zero, allowing implicit copy construction to be used
without hitting the case that's deprecated in C++11.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231138 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231136 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231135 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231134 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This type could be made copyable (= default a protected copy ctor in the
base class, and preferably make the derived class final to avoid risks
of providing a slicing copy operation to further derived classes) but it
seemed easier to avoid that complexity for a dump function that I assume
(by symmetry with ResourcePriorityQueue's dump, which was actively
buggy) not often used.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231133 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch was landed in r231035 and reverted because it was buggy.
This is fixed version of the same change.
Summary:
This patch is an attempt at making `DenseMapIterator`s "fail-fast".
Fail-fast iterators that have been invalidated due to insertion into
the host `DenseMap` deterministically trip an assert (in debug mode)
on access, instead of non-deterministically hitting memory corruption
issues.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, dberlin, ruiu, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: yaron.keren, chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7931
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231125 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Without this, use of this copy ctor is deprecated in C++11 due to the
presence of a user-declared dtor.
Marking the class final is just a little extra security that there are
no further derived classes that may then end up using the intermediate
base class's copy assignment operator and cause slicing to occur.
I didn't bother marking the other (non-test) base class final, since it
has reference members so it won't have any implicit assignment operators
anyway. Open to ideas on that, though.
We probably want a warning about use of a slicing assignment operator,
then I wouldn't worry so much about marking the class as final.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
