The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@169218 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and allow some optimizations to turn conditional branches into unconditional.
This commit adds a simple control-flow optimization which merges two consecutive
basic blocks which are connected by a single edge. This allows the codegen to
operate on larger basic blocks.
rdar://11973998
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@161852 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Instead, use simpler approach and let DBG_VALUE follow its predecessor instruction. After live debug value analysis pass, all DBG_VALUE instruction are placed at the right place. Thanks Jakob for the hint!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@132483 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
