The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@234679 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Without this, use of this copy ctor is deprecated in C++11 due to the
presence of a user-declared dtor.
Marking the class final is just a little extra security that there are
no further derived classes that may then end up using the intermediate
base class's copy assignment operator and cause slicing to occur.
I didn't bother marking the other (non-test) base class final, since it
has reference members so it won't have any implicit assignment operators
anyway. Open to ideas on that, though.
We probably want a warning about use of a slicing assignment operator,
then I wouldn't worry so much about marking the class as final.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@231114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument-dependent lookup can find it. This is another case where an
LLVM bug (not making operator<< visible) was masked by a GCC bug
(looking in the global namespace when it shouldn't).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92144 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- This is a pretty slow / memory intensive implementation, and I will likely
change it to an iterative model, but it works.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@90447 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
