Summary: x86 allows either ordering for the LOCK and DATA16 prefixes, but using GCC+GAS leads to different code generation than using LLVM. This change matches the order that GAS emits the x86 prefixes when a semicolon isn't used in inline assembly (see tc-i386.c comment before define LOCK_PREFIX), and helps simplify tooling that operates on the instruction's byte sequence (such as NaCl's validator). This change shouldn't have any performance impact.
Test Plan: ninja check
Reviewers: craig.topper, jvoung
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6630
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@224283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The logic for expanding atomics that aren't natively supported in
terms of cmpxchg loops is much simpler to express at the IR level. It
also allows the normal optimisations and CodeGen improvements to help
out with atomics, instead of using a limited set of possible
instructions..
rdar://problem/13496295
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@212119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The syntax for "cmpxchg" should now look something like:
cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 3 acquire monotonic
where the second ordering argument gives the required semantics in the case
that no exchange takes place. It should be no stronger than the first ordering
constraint and cannot be either "release" or "acq_rel" (since no store will
have taken place).
rdar://problem/15996804
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Clear 'mayStore' flag when loading from the atomic variable before the
spin loop
- Clear kill flag from one use to multiple use in registers forming the
address to that atomic variable
- don't use a physical register as live-in register in BB (neither entry
nor landing pad.) by copying it into virtual register
(patch by Cameron Zwarich)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176538 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Rewrite/merge pseudo-atomic instruction emitters to address the
following issue:
* Reduce one unnecessary load in spin-loop
previously the spin-loop looks like
thisMBB:
newMBB:
ld t1 = [bitinstr.addr]
op t2 = t1, [bitinstr.val]
not t3 = t2 (if Invert)
mov EAX = t1
lcs dest = [bitinstr.addr], t3 [EAX is implicit]
bz newMBB
fallthrough -->nextMBB
the 'ld' at the beginning of newMBB should be lift out of the loop
as lcs (or CMPXCHG on x86) will load the current memory value into
EAX. This loop is refined as:
thisMBB:
EAX = LOAD [MI.addr]
mainMBB:
t1 = OP [MI.val], EAX
LCMPXCHG [MI.addr], t1, [EAX is implicitly used & defined]
JNE mainMBB
sinkMBB:
* Remove immopc as, so far, all pseudo-atomic instructions has
all-register form only, there is no immedidate operand.
* Remove unnecessary attributes/modifiers in pseudo-atomic instruction
td
* Fix issues in PR13458
- Add comprehensive tests on atomic ops on various data types.
NOTE: Some of them are turned off due to missing functionality.
- Revise tests due to the new spin-loop generated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164281 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
