Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Frederic Riss
dd2cb9cae7 [dwarfdump] Resolve also variable specifications/abstract_origins.
DW_AT_specification and DW_AT_abstract_origin resolving was only performed
on subroutine DIEs because it used the getSubroutineName method. Introduce
a more generic getName() and use it to dump the reference attributes.

Testcases have been updated to check the printed names instead of the offsets
except when the name could be ambiguous.

Reviewers: dblaikie, samsonov

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5625

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219506 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-10 15:51:02 +00:00
Frederic Riss
f2eddd6694 [dwarfdump] Print the name for referenced specification of abstract_origin DIEs.
Reviewers: dblaikie, samsonov, echristo, aprantl

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5466

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219099 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-06 03:36:31 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
83902832de Revert "Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString""
This reverts commit r218918, effectively reapplying r218914 after fixing
an Ocaml bindings test and an Asan crash.  The root cause of the latter
was a tightened-up check in `DILexicalBlock::Verify()`, so I'll file a
PR to investigate who requires the loose check (and why).

Original commit message follows.

--

This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString.  Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.

Part of PR17891.

Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR.  If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@219010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-03 20:01:09 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
32e192aeb3 Revert "DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString"
This reverts commit r218914 while I investigate some bots.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-02 22:15:31 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
0917b70630 DI: Fold constant arguments into a single MDString
This patch addresses the first stage of PR17891 by folding constant
arguments together into a single MDString.  Integers are stringified and
a `\0` character is used as a separator.

Part of PR17891.

Note: I've attached my testcases upgrade scripts to the PR.  If I've
just broken your out-of-tree testcases, they might help.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218914 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-02 21:56:57 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
02474a32eb Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.

Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.

By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.

The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)

This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.

What this patch doesn't do:

This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491

Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!

Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-01 18:55:02 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
10c4265675 Revert r218778 while investigating buldbot breakage.
"Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra"

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218782 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-01 18:10:54 +00:00
Adrian Prantl
076fd5dfc1 Move the complex address expression out of DIVariable and into an extra
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.

Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.

By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.

The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)

This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.

What this patch doesn't do:

This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491

Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-10-01 17:55:39 +00:00
David Blaikie
ae13f23de6 DebugInfo: Put concrete definitions referencing abstract definitions in the same scope as the abstract definition.
This seems like a simple cleanup/improved consistency, but also helps
lay the foundation to fix the bug mentioned in the test case: concrete
definitions preceeding any inlined usage aren't properly split into
concrete + abstract (because they're not known to need it until it's too
late).

Once we start deferring this choice until later, we won't have the
choice to put concrete definitions for inlined subroutines in a
different scope from concrete definitions for non-inlined subroutines
(since we won't know at time-of-construction which one it'll be). This
change brings those two cases into alignment ahead of that future
chaneg/fix.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209547 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2014-05-23 20:25:15 +00:00